Jump to content


. . . .

Quick Links .......... Lake Levels ............ SPA Generation Schedule

Photo

Bennett Springs Live Cam


  • Please log in to reply
113 replies to this topic

#1 patfish

patfish

    Pirate Perch

  • Fishing Buddy
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 656 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 02 March 2010 - 05:59 PM

Does anyone else find this unnerving? I do.

No money for a fish cleaning station but this?!?!?!

#2 troutfiend1985

troutfiend1985

    Paddlefish

  • Fishing Buddy
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 626 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:Royals baseball, law (I hate Scalia), my family, fly fishing, bugging Chief and Outside Bend, and sometimes Eric.

Posted 02 March 2010 - 06:11 PM

Yeah, that is a frustrating decision. You would think that the department would be more concerned about making sure that the stream doesn't have the "trout gut hatch" rather than having a live web cam. I think that people already know about Bennett, one needs to look no further than weekends at Bennett for proof of that. I just don't see the reasoning for spending money on a live web cam instead of investing that money into a cleaning station. Wish someone would be held liable for that call.
“The greatest menace to freedom is an inert people” J. Brandeis

#3 fozzie.

fozzie.

    Blue Catfish

  • Fishing Buddy
  • PipPip
  • 124 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 02 March 2010 - 07:17 PM

I guess to me it's a non-issue, it probably costs a whole lot less to put up and maintain a webcam than it does to put up and maintain a fish cleaning station.

I wonder if Trout Unlimited, Federation of Fly Fishers, or just a group of interested anglers could take up a collection to get a cleaning station built. Donate the funds to DNR with the stipulation they're used to construct the station. Perhaps even do an auction or some other fundraiser.
Tom.

#4 jdmidwest

jdmidwest

    Highfin Carpsucker

  • Fishing Buddy
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,445 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:SE MO

Posted 02 March 2010 - 07:20 PM

Since I catch and release, the gut station is wasted on me. But being able to see the condition of a stream before I leave on a 4 hour journey, handy. The live web cam costs a few hundred bucks, the gut station, several 100 thousands. $165,857.04 to be exact at the Montauk location, if it came in as bid without any change orders.

MDC Constrution Contracts

Scroll down to 3-18-2009 to see bid.
"Life has become immeasurably better since I have been forced to stop taking it seriously."
Hunter S. Thompson

#5 patfish

patfish

    Pirate Perch

  • Fishing Buddy
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 656 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 02 March 2010 - 07:41 PM

My point is not really the lack of a cleaning station, more of a "how many places can I go and NOT be filmed, especially without my knowledge".

Why spend money on webcams when you can maybe give someone even a part time job?

JD, there's not enough info already on line for you to determine if or if not BSSP is fishable? Really?

#6 FishinCricket

FishinCricket

    MFU know-it-all

  • Fishing Buddy
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,979 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Lebanon, MO
  • Interests:My beautiful Wife, Disc Golf, Guitar playing and songwriting, singing, poetry..... selling cars (more of a profession actually), Camping, FISHING!!!!!!!

Posted 02 March 2010 - 07:55 PM

I overheard the old boys at the coffeeshop sayin' they had a few of em out there..

You reckon their plannin on sellin' videos of me takin a spill of that there dam?

I'll agree that it's nice to get a visual of the river before I head down...

I'll also agree that I don't enjoy the idea of being surveiled without my knowledge.. Does anyone know if they have any signs stating that you are being recorded?
"Meeeeeh, Ain't I a stinka?"
-Bugs Bunny

#7 fozzie.

fozzie.

    Blue Catfish

  • Fishing Buddy
  • PipPip
  • 124 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 02 March 2010 - 08:37 PM

Eh, I don't see anything too sinister about it. If someone gets their rocks off watching me fish over the internets, so be it- it's not as though I'm smoking dope or burying bodies. Sometimes other anglers wind up in the pictures I take of the stream or of a fishing partner's catch- does that constitute "surveilance?" Honestly, if I'm out fishing, I'm usually not thinking about much of anything else, much less where the cameras are.

And Bennett is a pretty popular, very public spot. And look at the bright side- it may even make people think twice about playing hookie from work, thereby lessening weekday crowds. ;)

If they needed the additional labor then sure, I wouldn't mind seeing more folks employed there as opposed to them investing in a webcam. But if it came down to it, I guess I'd rather have a live stream feed more than a guy being paid by DNR to sit in a shop and drink coffee half the day. Just my opinion though.
Tom.

#8 fishinwrench

fishinwrench

    MFU

  • Fishing Buddy
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,459 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Lake of the Ozarks

Posted 02 March 2010 - 08:38 PM

I overheard the old boys at the coffeeshop sayin' they had a few of em out there..

You reckon their plannin on sellin' videos of me takin a spill of that there dam?

I'll agree that it's nice to get a visual of the river before I head down...

I'll also agree that I don't enjoy the idea of being surveiled without my knowledge.. Does anyone know if they have any signs stating that you are being recorded?



Hey, if you're not doing anything wrong then there's nothing to worry about. (there, got that out of the way) :rolleyes:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Hold the phone !
$165,857.04 for a fish cleaning station ? Dude, I built a 1800sq.ft. two-story house with surrounding CCA deck and a seperate 30x30' garage for 98,675.00 just a couple years ago (less the concrete work). Who bid that project out ?

Or is this one of those things like the 400.00 toilet seats and 14.00 pencils at the county courthouse's ?
"Time is running out. Fishing days are finite and, increasingly it seems, harder to come by. Use them wisely.", joeD

#9 jdmidwest

jdmidwest

    Highfin Carpsucker

  • Fishing Buddy
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,445 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:SE MO

Posted 02 March 2010 - 08:39 PM

Truth be known, it may save a few jobs and catch a few poachers. One person watching several cams for violations. Of course, nobody has elaborated as to the location and number of the cams. It may be a way to monitor the hatchery. Lack of info leads to speculation.

Is this a live web cam so we can all watch?
"Life has become immeasurably better since I have been forced to stop taking it seriously."
Hunter S. Thompson

#10 eric1978

eric1978

    MFU

  • Fishing Buddy
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,168 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 02 March 2010 - 08:47 PM

Is this a live web cam so we can all watch?

http://redirectingat...tdoors/Fishing/

#11 patfish

patfish

    Pirate Perch

  • Fishing Buddy
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 656 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 02 March 2010 - 08:58 PM

JD: "Proud American clinging to my guns, religion, values, and flyrods!!"

Try clinging to the right to do whatever the hell you want without being filmed.

If you drive 4+ hours to C&R in a trout park.... you're just an old fool.

#12 stlfisher

stlfisher

    American Eel

  • Fishing Buddy
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,368 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Hillsboro, MO
  • Interests:Fly fishing, Fly Tying

Posted 02 March 2010 - 09:18 PM

Well I know that next time I call in "sick" to work to not fisher under the bridge. Then again I could call one of my buddies at work and tell him to tune in to the web cam, give him a wave, and ask him how his day is going. :hi:


In all seriousness it doesn't bother me and probably cost very little to set up. In saying that, I am in favor of fish cleaning station as well. While I don't keep many fish the "gut" hatch needs to be addressed. I do like that I can see the water before I would choose to head down...that is 3 hours drive for me and opinions on fishable water aren't always the most accurate.

#13 jdmidwest

jdmidwest

    Highfin Carpsucker

  • Fishing Buddy
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,445 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:SE MO

Posted 03 March 2010 - 06:21 AM

JD: "Proud American clinging to my guns, religion, values, and flyrods!!"

Try clinging to the right to do whatever the hell you want without being filmed.

If you drive 4+ hours to C&R in a trout park.... you're just an old fool.


Pull your panties out of a wad there guy, Trout taste like Asian Carp and are as boney as a gigged sucker. Catch and release is fun though, don't have to drag them around on a stringer and trash the stream with guts.

Where can you go today that you are not being filmed? Game cameras in the woods, cameras in MDC parking lots to deter vandals, etc. It is just a part of modern life, technology has gotten cheap and people are amused by it.
"Life has become immeasurably better since I have been forced to stop taking it seriously."
Hunter S. Thompson

#14 jdmidwest

jdmidwest

    Highfin Carpsucker

  • Fishing Buddy
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,445 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:SE MO

Posted 03 March 2010 - 06:24 AM

Hold the phone !
$165,857.04 for a fish cleaning station ? Dude, I built a 1800sq.ft. two-story house with surrounding CCA deck and a seperate 30x30' garage for 98,675.00 just a couple years ago (less the concrete work). Who bid that project out ?

Or is this one of those things like the 400.00 toilet seats and 14.00 pencils at the county courthouse's ?


Follow the link, it shows plans and specs, bidders list, and winning bids for all MDC projects last year. I thought it was a little pricey myself, of course it was a prevailing wage state job.
"Life has become immeasurably better since I have been forced to stop taking it seriously."
Hunter S. Thompson

#15 trout fanatic

trout fanatic

    Green Sunfish

  • Fishing Buddy
  • PipPipPip
  • 384 posts
  • Location:Warrensburg, Mo
  • Interests:Fly fishing, fly tying

Posted 03 March 2010 - 07:52 AM

Another great use of tax dollars spent so that our illustrious leaders can watch me pea in the woods. Good job!

#16 eric1978

eric1978

    MFU

  • Fishing Buddy
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,168 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 03 March 2010 - 08:45 AM

Another great use of tax dollars spent so that our illustrious leaders can watch me pea in the woods. Good job!

pea?

#17 trout fanatic

trout fanatic

    Green Sunfish

  • Fishing Buddy
  • PipPipPip
  • 384 posts
  • Location:Warrensburg, Mo
  • Interests:Fly fishing, fly tying

Posted 03 March 2010 - 09:03 AM

pea?

Of course, ya don't think I would urinate in the woods do ya?

#18 Bill B.

Bill B.

    Carp

  • Fishing Buddy
  • PipPip
  • 191 posts

Posted 03 March 2010 - 04:25 PM

Don't criticize "pea." You'll cause a rhubarb.

It's 4:30 in the afternoon on March 3, and the bridge pool looks deserted. I'd rather be there than behind this desk.

#19 eric1978

eric1978

    MFU

  • Fishing Buddy
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,168 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 03 March 2010 - 05:55 PM

Don't criticize "pea." You'll cause a rhubarb.

rhubarb?

#20 TroutFearMe

TroutFearMe

    Bluegill

  • Fishing Buddy
  • PipPip
  • 141 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:St Louis

Posted 04 March 2010 - 08:47 AM

I am all for the cams at the park, maybe it will make everyone think twice I wonder if they have put these in at any other park without speaking of it. Ok I have to go I have to pee




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

.
count web page traffic
XM Satellite Radio
.