I would have to agree with you, Kat. I don't believe the Conservationist is anti-hunting or anti-fishing. Yes, they have the occasional blunders, like the whole river otter thing...but there wouldn't be a magazine like the Conservationist if it weren't for hunters and fishers. At least not free to MO taxpayers. People also have to understand that MDC is full of a variety of biologists, researchers, wildlife techs, etc,...coming from all walks of life. Liberals and Conservatives. I can't say that the magazine is anti-hunting or ant-fishing at all. MDC needs to make money, so they heavily rely on hunters and fishers to buy permits to keep MDC one of the best wildlife agencies in the U.S. Everyone with a wildlife degree wants to work for MDC, because a person can actually live off a salary from MDC. Other state agencies pay considerably less for the same jobs. I am a hunter, fisherman and a trapper. I personally look forward to the mag every month. Just my 2 cents.