Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Members
Posted

Now that we can start thinking about wading the White again (maybe?) I am confused about the tailwater chart from the COE website.

Looking at todays report, it looks like generation of 38 - 50 MW caused a tailwater level of 453 feet. But I was always told that dead low tailwater was right at 450 feet, and that 45-50 MW generation was about 1 full unit, which would cause a tailwater rise of about 1 foot (not 3 feet).

I assume that the tailwater level is taken up close to the dam, so previous generation has a minimal effect.

Am I missing something here, or do I just need to forget about these COE charts?

Date time lake tailwater ft cfs mwh

05DEC2008 1000 653.73 454.37 6770 84

05DEC2008 1100 653.82 453.76 5066 56

05DEC2008 1200 653.82 453.58 4706 51

05DEC2008 1300 653.76 453.05 3314 38

05DEC2008 1400 653.73 453.10 3722 45

05DEC2008 1500 653.70 453.43 4034 50

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.