Members Zeke Kuehn Posted December 24, 2011 Members Posted December 24, 2011 The attachment is a paper I wrote on the water losses in Crane Creek. It gets a little wordy, describing the soils in the area and process that transfer surface water into the ground. So if your not into that then skip to the discussion part. OZA.pdf "Fish Long and prosper"- John Geirach
RSBreth Posted December 25, 2011 Posted December 25, 2011 Not a year goes by where I don't here someone lamenting the fact that "all the water in Crane has dried up". It's just that one big losing section they're looking at. That looks like it took a while to put together - good work.
Members Craig C Posted December 26, 2011 Members Posted December 26, 2011 Not a year goes by where I don't here someone lamenting the fact that "all the water in Crane has dried up". It's just that one big losing section they're looking at. That looks like it took a while to put together - good work. I really enjoyed reading that. Ive been stompin those grounds since the late 80s and have seen many changes over the years. I have very fond memories of how it was in the early 90s. Sadly there are fishing holes that will likely not be good again for who knows how long. Fishing used to be great on that upper end all the way to town. I know it wasnt the cause of anything but when they pulled out the low water bridge that used to be there and started building up to make that higher bridge stuff aent been the same.
Members Zeke Kuehn Posted December 26, 2011 Author Members Posted December 26, 2011 I really enjoyed reading that. Ive been stompin those grounds since the late 80s and have seen many changes over the years. I have very fond memories of how it was in the early 90s. Sadly there are fishing holes that will likely not be good again for who knows how long. Fishing used to be great on that upper end all the way to town. I know it wasnt the cause of anything but when they pulled out the low water bridge that used to be there and started building up to make that higher bridge stuff aent been the same. That the bridge being could be what has caused a lot of the water loss in the losing section. Water can get trapped by the fist to head size rock that were used beneath the bridges. These rocks are good during high water flow to slow water down but it can hurt during low flow conditions. "Fish Long and prosper"- John Geirach
Members Craig C Posted December 26, 2011 Members Posted December 26, 2011 That the bridge being could be what has caused a lot of the water loss in the losing section. Water can get trapped by the fist to head size rock that were used beneath the bridges. These rocks are good during high water flow to slow water down but it can hurt during low flow conditions. Just up stream from that bridge in that wide area used to be full of big fish. besides the trout there were also smallmouth and gar. I dont remember exactly when they built the bridge but I think the current bridge is the second attempt. Originally it was a low water bridge that often if not always had water flowing over the top. I think they then put in big culverts but I believe they got washed out. I know in the floods of 93 the creek was up all the way down past the raildroad bridge.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now