gonefishin Posted June 15, 2007 Posted June 15, 2007 Populations of 20 Common Birds Declining Audubon Society Study Finds Populations of 20 U.S. Birds Are Down by Half Over Past 40 Years By SETH BORENSTEIN The Associated Press WASHINGTON The populations of 20 common American birds from the fence-sitting meadowlark to the whippoorwill with its haunting call are half what they were 40 years ago, according to an analysis released Thursday. Suburban sprawl, climate change and other invasive species are largely to blame, said the study's author Greg Butcher of the National Audubon Society. "Most of these we don't expect will go extinct," he said. "We think they reflect other things that are happening in the environment that we should be worried about." Last month a different group of researchers reported that seven species had dramatically declined because of West Nile virus. The species harmed by West Nile are different from those listed in the new study except for the little chickadee, hard-hit on both lists. Many of the species listed as declining in the new study depend on open grassy habitats that are disappearing, said Butcher, Audubon's bird conservation director. Some of the birds, such as the evening grosbeak, used to be so plentiful that people would complain about how they crowded bird-feeders and finished off 50-pound sacks of sunflower seeds in just a couple days. But the colorful and gregarious grosbeak's numbers have plummeted 78 percent in the past 40 years. "It was an amazing phenomena all through the '70s that's just disappeared. It's just a really dramatic thing because it was in people's back yards and (now) it's not in people's back yards," said Butcher. For the study, researchers looked at bird populations of more than half a million which covered a wide range. They compared databases for 550 species from two different bird surveys the Audubon's own Christmas bird count and the U.S. Geological Survey's breeding bird survey in June. The numbers of 20 different birds were at least half what they were in 1967. Today there are 432 million fewer of these bird species, including the northern pintail, greater scaup, boreal chickadee, common tern, loggerhead shrike, field sparrow, grasshopper sparrow, snow bunting, black-throated sparrow, lark sparrow, common grackle, American bittern, horned lark, little blue heron and ruffed grouse. The northern bobwhite and its familiar wake-up whistle once seemed to be everywhere in the East. Last Christmas, volunteer bird counters could find only three of them and only 18 Eastern meadowlarks in Massachusetts. The bobwhite had the biggest drop among common birds. In 1967, there were 31 million of this distinctive plump bird. Now they number closer to 5.5 million. "Things we all think of as familiar backyard birds ... they appear in books and children's stories and suddenly some of them are way less familiar than they should be," said John Fitzpatrick, director of the Cornell ornithology lab, who was not part of the study. Audubon Board Chairman Carol Browner, former head of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, called the declines "a warning signal." "We are concerned. Is it an emergency? No, but concerns can quickly become an emergency," she said. While these common birds are in decline, others are taking their place or even elbowing them aside. The wild turkey, once in deep trouble, is growing at a rate of 14 percent a year. The double-crested cormorant, pushed nearly to extinction by DDT, is growing at a rate of 8 percent a year and populations of the pesky Canada goose increase by 7 percent yearly. Many of the birds that are disappearing are specialists, while the thriving ones are generalists that do well in urban sprawl and all kinds of environments, Butcher said. In a way it's the Wal-Mart-ization of America's skies, he said. "The robins, the Carolina wrens, the blue jays, the crows, those kinds of birds, are doing just fine, thank you," Butcher said. "They really get along in suburban habitats, most of them even like city parks, so they are not as susceptible to the human changes in environment." But nothing matches the take-over ability of one invading bird. "Right now the Eurasian collared-dove is conquering America," Butcher said. A dove-like bird that first entered Florida in the 1980s, it now is the most prevalent bird in the Sunshine State and is in more than 30 states. "Soon you'll be seeing Eurasian collared-doves in any city in the world," he said. On the Net: http://www.audubon.org/ I would rather be fishin'. "Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote." Benjamin Franklin, 1759
Chief Grey Bear Posted June 15, 2007 Posted June 15, 2007 That is the reason I shoot every Starling and English Sparrow I can. Another contributor to the decline is house cats. I read a report a few years ago that in North America house cats kill in excess of 1 Billion(yes that is with a song birds a year. It doesn't matter how well fed the feline is, it is instinct that they have to hunt and kill. Not eat, but hunt and kill. Chief Grey Bear Living is dangerous to your health Owner Ozark Fishing Expeditions Co-Owner, Chief Executive Product Development Team Jerm Werm Executive Pro Staff Team Agnew Executive Pro Staff Paul Dallas Productions Executive Pro Staff Team Heddon, River Division Chief Primary Consultant Missouri Smallmouth Alliance Executive Vice President Ronnie Moore Outdoors
gonefishin Posted June 15, 2007 Author Posted June 15, 2007 Yea. Cats are hard on them and so are Startlings. I think Startlings are probably just as bad if not worse than the cats. Startlings = The skys version of common carp. I would rather be fishin'. "Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote." Benjamin Franklin, 1759
Chief Grey Bear Posted June 16, 2007 Posted June 16, 2007 That is the reason I shoot every Starling and English Sparrow I can. Another contributor to the decline is house cats. I read a report a few years ago that in North America house cats kill in excess of 1 Billion(yes that is with a song birds a year. It doesn't matter how well fed the feline is, it is instinct that they have to hunt and kill. Not eat, but hunt and kill. Well, I was gonna ask how in the heck that got there. But I found out when I went to type this response. I should have put a space between the B and the ). But I didn't and I got a When need to start some kind of Starling Shooting club. OOOhh OOOOOhh I know a Starling tournament! Chief Grey Bear Living is dangerous to your health Owner Ozark Fishing Expeditions Co-Owner, Chief Executive Product Development Team Jerm Werm Executive Pro Staff Team Agnew Executive Pro Staff Paul Dallas Productions Executive Pro Staff Team Heddon, River Division Chief Primary Consultant Missouri Smallmouth Alliance Executive Vice President Ronnie Moore Outdoors
gonefishin Posted June 16, 2007 Author Posted June 16, 2007 good idea but there is a problem. Since they decided that the MO Wildlife Code is a permissive code you are not allowed to kill anything if there isn't a specific listing for it in the code. It has bee a few years ago but I knew some people who were fined and their shotguns confiscated for shooting them. According to the agent there is no season or limit on them therefore they cannot be killed even if they are a nuisance. I don't know if the code has changed since then. I would rather be fishin'. "Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote." Benjamin Franklin, 1759
Crippled Caddis Posted June 16, 2007 Posted June 16, 2007 gf wrote: <Since they decided that the MO Wildlife Code is a permissive code you are not allowed to kill anything if there isn't a specific listing for it in the code. It has bee a few years ago but I knew some people who were fined and their shotguns confiscated for shooting them. According to the agent there is no season or limit on them therefore they cannot be killed even if they are a nuisance. I don't know if the code has changed since then.> Im not a MO resident but Starlings are an imvasive species and therefore NOT Federally protected. As are the 'English Sparrow'. Both are detrimental to native birds and should be eradicated whenever and wherever possible. If the MO authorities protect them then they must be the only state in the union who do so. Can someone either verify or invalidate that? FWIW----for those who want to take on the invasive species raiding their birdfeeders I'm something of an airgun specialist so if you have questions regarding 'urban sniping' of invasive species I can probably handle the pellet-gun part of your curiosity. CC "You need only reflect that one of the best ways to get yourself a reputation as a dangerous citizen these days is to go about repeating the very phrases which our founding fathers used in their struggle for independence." ---Charles Austin Beard
Chief Grey Bear Posted June 16, 2007 Posted June 16, 2007 The state of Missouri does not protect the English Sparrow or the Starling. In fact in an issue of the Missouri Conservationist a couple of years ago they advocated the eradication of the two. Like feral hogs, starlings and sparrows cause destruction to the environment and therefore can and in my book will be dealt with severely and permanently. Death by severe acute high velocity lead poisoning. OK so my pellet gun only goes about 750fps, it works very well. Chief Grey Bear Living is dangerous to your health Owner Ozark Fishing Expeditions Co-Owner, Chief Executive Product Development Team Jerm Werm Executive Pro Staff Team Agnew Executive Pro Staff Paul Dallas Productions Executive Pro Staff Team Heddon, River Division Chief Primary Consultant Missouri Smallmouth Alliance Executive Vice President Ronnie Moore Outdoors
crappiefisherman Posted June 16, 2007 Posted June 16, 2007 the double breasted matrass thrasher is also on an alarming decline in southwest missouri,at least on my side of taney county [ [
gonefishin Posted June 16, 2007 Author Posted June 16, 2007 I hope you are right and the law has changed. I was reading a MO Conservation a while back and it said the MO code is a permissive code therefore if there is not a specific code then it is illegal to harm any animal in the state of MO. Before anyone jumps there is another code dealing animals that are a threat to you. Anyway I hope the law has changed. I could be wrong but I have not seen a specific code that allows killing starlings or feral cats for that matter. I would rather be fishin'. "Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote." Benjamin Franklin, 1759
Chief Grey Bear Posted June 16, 2007 Posted June 16, 2007 Well, give me a couple of days and let me see if I can get an offical 'ruling' if you will from MDC. Ha! Better make it a couple of weeks!LOL!! Chief Grey Bear Living is dangerous to your health Owner Ozark Fishing Expeditions Co-Owner, Chief Executive Product Development Team Jerm Werm Executive Pro Staff Team Agnew Executive Pro Staff Paul Dallas Productions Executive Pro Staff Team Heddon, River Division Chief Primary Consultant Missouri Smallmouth Alliance Executive Vice President Ronnie Moore Outdoors
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now