Ok, this is funny. Just as soon as I said I hadn't heard anything, I had apperantly recieved a letter in the mail yesterday from my lawyer. Here is what it says:
I have met again witht the prosecuting attorney and he has made a recommendation on your tresspass charge from last summer. He is willing to dismiss the charge against you if you voluntarily agree in the future to avoid going on Mr. Prater's property.
The prosecutor understands and argrees that there is a difference of legal opinion as to the ownership of creek property, its usage by passers-by, versus claims of property owners.
However, he is mostly concerned that there be no personal confrontation between a canoer or fisherman and a property owner that might escalate into a physical or violent confrontation where one party or the other may be hurt or worse.
If you would be in agreement to this, the can be dismissed and no further court appearance necessary.
If you want yoiur date in court about the usage of gravel bars or creek property and make it a test case, then we will have the judge set it for trial and we will have a hearing about it.
We are scheduled back on February 15th. Please le me know whether you are willing to be done with this at this time and close the file, or proceed with trial.