I don't think it would qualify even if you attached a fly to the rapala. The key here is the definition of the word "fly". According the the MDC a "fly" is "Any lure constructed of fur, hair, yarn, tinsel, or thread on a single hook, with or without a spinner attached" By that definition a rapla is not legal because you are adding the fly to another lure instead of using one already constructed on a hook, and the rapala is made of balsa wood, not fur, hair, tinsel, yarn or thread. This would also preclude the use of a fly on the back of a spoon such as a Little Cleo, but a single hook Rooster Tail is legal because the 'fly" is already made into the spinner, also a fly on the back of a Hildebrant spinner is legal too since the Code says "with or without a spinner attached" It is a confusing mess I agree.