Terry Beeson Posted November 10, 2006 Posted November 10, 2006 Of COURSE there is "insignificant change" in the DO at the DAM with increases of flow. There is no change because there is no significant change in the turbulance from the dam to the DO monitor. How far downstream from the outlet are we talking? Now... Go DOWNSTREAM a half mile or so, do the same comparison. In fact, go downstream a mile or so and note the difference in DO there and at the dam. Oxygen gets into water by diffusion from the surrounding air, by aeration (rapid movement), and as a waste product of photosynthesis. So, in effect, the more "flow" you have, the more aeration which will increase the DO levels. Now, does that mean we don't need aereators at the dam? Quite the contrary when it comes to Norfork. The DO content of the water coming out of the dam at this time is very low. The quicker you get the DO level up, the better. The Norfork is not a very long fishery, so the DO needs to be added AT THE DAM to ensure sufficient DO for the fish in the Norfork. As for BS, TR, GF, and Beaver tailwaters - they need quick DO too. They just have more help by being longer and having various other sources the Norfork lacks (confluences, length, etc.) TIGHT LINES, YA'LL "There he stands, draped in more equipment than a telephone lineman, trying to outwit an organism with a brain no bigger than a breadcrumb, and getting licked in the process." - Paul O’Neil
Don Allenbaugh Posted November 11, 2006 Posted November 11, 2006 According to the tech he was talking about several places on the river not just at the dam. Don A
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now