At least they added an amendment to it. Reads like it might be helpful depending on how they determine if "such a right exists on a watercourse.".
AMEND House Bill No. 2405, Page 2, Section 60.700, Line 25, by inserting after all of said section and line the following: "60.701. Nothing in sections 60.700 to 60.708 shall be construed to limit or expand any public easement for navigational or recreational purposes if such a right exists on a watercourse."; and Further amend said bill by amending the title, enacting clause, and intersectional references accordingly.