Good points there, Gavin. It was always about habitat, and the ability of trout to reproduce given the habitat. The presumption always was that there was value in the self-sustaining populations of rainbows. Anyone want to argue against protecting Crane? Good luck convincing anybody that Crane or some of the other special places ought to go wild, or the money should be spent elsewhere. That's just reality right there. Did trout crowd out some natives? Who cares -- there's plenty of room for the natives and only a handful of places like Crane for the rainbows. Gotta keep those finicky trout fishermen happy -- they pay a big portion of the freight on all this.
I'm lost in the whole spotted bass part of this discussion. It's pretty evident to me what's happening, and there haven't been any solid arguments that make me feel like it's ok to just let it go that way. But I'm gonna stay out of all that.
Me, I'm gonna lobby to keep my beloved wild trout happy, well-fed and spawning. And, part of that is keeping the Blue Ribbon stretch length limits high, creel limits low, tackle restricted to low-mortality methods (like flies). If the trade off for all that is low fishing pressure and a lot of forum bitching, I'll take it.