I thought after first reading about the fact that this fish was a triploid rainbow it should be considered a seperate catagory. Thinking it was just like the difference between the hybrid bass is to the striper and white bass. Yes it might be of the same species but genetically different. But then reading the comment about the Florida strain bass and the Northern strain bass and how there is no distinction between the two I was undecided. Since they are not in two seperate catagories should we make a seperate catagory for this guys monster rainbow? It almost seems unfair to me, but then I think that this fish is genetically modified to grow big maybe it should be. Then there is the difference between the Florida strain(that grows larger) and the Northern strain (that is more aggressive). I am up in the air about show the record should be kept.
Anyway you look at it the fish is a giant. An impressive catch for any fisherman. I myself am jealous. Ask yourselfs how many of you out there would go fishing for them if you knew they were stocked in the lakes or rivers around Missouri, or would you not fish for them because they were GM. I just don't know if it should be considered the world record Rainbow trout, world record Rainbow trout with an asterix, or a world record Triploid Rainbow trout.