Root Admin Phil Lilley Posted March 23, 2009 Root Admin Posted March 23, 2009 The work to shore up the bank at the Fall Creek Condo complex continues. Boy, they're spending a ton of money on this project! Looks like they've poured concrete on the actual bank and I assume they're going to continue with the shot rock up to the buildings. Pretty impressive project!
rainbow Posted March 23, 2009 Posted March 23, 2009 Phil, glad I don't have a place there anymore. The special assessment will be huge. See you next week.
loo10 Posted March 23, 2009 Posted March 23, 2009 I'm going to miss fishing the trees in that area. I'm not a fan of rip-rap. Rich Looten Springfield, Missouri "If people don't occasionally walk away from you shaking their heads, you're doing something wrong."- John Gierach
fly2fish Posted March 23, 2009 Posted March 23, 2009 I stayed there last week, I was in the building across the street from the ones on the water, I think it is the one that you can see between the riverfront ones. I did not hear any of the construction or was bothered by any of the trucks coming and going. I did go look at the backside, it looks like those rocks will attract fish during generation since it will create some turbulence over them. F2F
bigredbirdfan Posted March 23, 2009 Posted March 23, 2009 Phil, glad I don't have a place there anymore. The special assessment will be huge. See you next week. If I owned and got an assessment I would sue the developer, contractor and association. That unit was never properly excavated and was constructed too close to the shoreline to begin with. The other units as well. But is it any surprise with little to no buildings in Branson constructed per ICC building codes? You get what you pay for in Branson.
FRENZEL Posted March 24, 2009 Posted March 24, 2009 There are still plenty of trees left for you to fish just a few yards down! TRACY FRENZEL FRENZELS GUIDE SERVICE 417-699-2277 "ONE MORE CAST"
twosets Posted March 24, 2009 Posted March 24, 2009 I wonder if insurance would have covered this damage. That building was quite a ways from the river before the great flood of 08. "This is not Nam. This is bowling. There are rules."
2sheds Posted March 25, 2009 Posted March 25, 2009 I would think they could sue the accountants who forced them to buy into such a property. Having created this chain of impoundments, the Corp needs freedom to do what they must to manage the water.
Zack Hoyt Posted March 25, 2009 Posted March 25, 2009 If I owned and got an assessment I would sue the developer, contractor and association. That unit was never properly excavated and was constructed too close to the shoreline to begin with. The other units as well. But is it any surprise with little to no buildings in Branson constructed per ICC building codes? You get what you pay for in Branson. Please state which code you are referring to? Do you have previous knowlege of how close they were to waters edge upon issuance of the building permit? Please do not throw out unsubstantiated claims without a way to back them up. Zack Hoyt OAF Contributor Flies, Lies, and Other Diversions
twosets Posted March 25, 2009 Posted March 25, 2009 Ditto to 2sheds, always ready to imprision the cpa's Semms like this was a metalirgic engineering failure to me. All metalirgic engineers should share the cost, perhaps a spiffy new 90% tax would do the trick. "This is not Nam. This is bowling. There are rules."
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now