Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

What gets me is that nature is allowing the eggs to be vulnerable to predators for such a long period of time.

It is what it is, life will find a way

"Honor is a man's gift to himself" Rob Roy McGregor

Posted

You are right Mitch. It is what it is. And it appears to work. I guess I will just leave it at that.

Chief Grey Bear

Living is dangerous to your health

Owner Ozark Fishing Expeditions

Co-Owner, Chief Executive Product Development Team Jerm Werm

Executive Pro Staff Team Agnew

Executive Pro Staff Paul Dallas Productions

Executive Pro Staff Team Heddon, River Division

Chief Primary Consultant Missouri Smallmouth Alliance

Executive Vice President Ronnie Moore Outdoors

Posted

My guess for trout is that they adapted a winter spawn to avoid flood events that are more likely to occur other times of the year. Longer incubation due to cold water is the tradeoff for not loosing the entire nest to a flood. The size of the eggs probably lead to a higher survival of young which is the tradeoff for not having as many eggs. Evidently it works as trout haven't gone extinct and are even doing well in some places where they aren't native. Don't pick a fight with nature, we always lose.

"The problem with a politician’s quote on Facebook is you don’t know whether or not they really said it." –Abraham Lincoln

Tales of an Ozark Campground Proprietor

Dead Drift Fly Shop

Posted
It is what it is, life will find a way

I like this comment. Nature finds "a" way but it isn't necessarily the "best" way. The only requirement nature has is that it works.

It's a lot of fun to play adaptationist games as to "why" certain things happen, but the details of history and the constraints of ancestry often play a much more important role in why things are the way they are.

My guess for trout is that they adapted a winter spawn to avoid flood events that are more likely to occur other times of the year. Longer incubation due to cold water is the tradeoff for not loosing the entire nest to a flood. The size of the eggs probably lead to a higher survival of young which is the tradeoff for not having as many eggs. Evidently it works as trout haven't gone extinct and are even doing well in some places where they aren't native. .

The egg-size/egg quantity trade-off that Justin mentions here is a generally accepted evolutionary trade-off (more or less the same quantity/quality trade-off Muddy mentioned earlier).

One problem with the winter flood theory is that in places like the Pacific Northwest, winter floods drive the whole system and most of the spawning happens between October and March. The salmon/steelhead in that region apparently do have the ability to shift spawning timing because a few summer runs occur in that region, but those summer-run systems have the same flood cycle. Something else seems to be driving spawning seasonality.

Pure speculation, but maybe it has to do with a nest versus scattering of the eggs. Perhaps overall the trout eggs aren't as vulnerable to predation.

Both taxa have nests, both undergo egg predation. Centrarchid males guard their eggs and fry over a nest and salmonid females bury most of their eggs in gravel of the "redd" (nest).

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.