Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I think we found out long ago that it;s not smart to mess with mother nature. If fishermen want crawdads they should get them from the waters they fish.

Today's release is tomorrows gift to another fisherman.

Posted

I think we found out long ago that it;s not smart to mess with mother nature. If fishermen want crawdads they should get them from the waters they fish.

What about Minnows and other Bait?

oneshot

Posted

Same for any live bait. What can be better than bait the fish recognize? Minnows are easy to trap.

Today's release is tomorrows gift to another fisherman.

Posted
I wouldn't be worried. No one's proposed banning minnows and other bait.

Yet!

Who is to say there are not already studies being done to check the invasiveness of the bait minnow and the lowly cricket. I know several crickets escape the tube when I fish with them. They have been having problems with viruses in the places that raise the crickets. What if that gets out an runs amoke in the wild killing all of the native crickets. And most people dump minnows when finished, they are not native and could cause problems.

Why don't we just ban bait and fish with artificials?

"Life has become immeasurably better since I have been forced to stop taking it seriously."

Hunter S. Thompson

Posted

A few differences between minnows and crayfish...there really aren't many commercially raised species of bait minnows. Pretty much, if I remember correctly, emerald shiners and fathead or bluntnose minnows. Both are very well established if not native pretty much everywhere, and not doing any obvious harm. Goldfish are another matter, however, and we probably shouldn't be using goldfish for bait, but they've had a lot of years to do damage and they don't seem to thrive on our wild waters. I've seen some big ones, but you don't see much if any natural reproduction most places. And minnows are probably a lot easier to identify as to species for the average bait dealer and any other interested party, so it would be easier to insure that only the ones that have not demonstrated the potential for harm are being sold.

Having said all that, I have absolutely no problem with banning ANY species that is shown to cause harm.

Posted

I wouldn't be opposed to an all-out ban of live bait sales, but it's neither here nor there- the proposed rule only affects crayfish.

I wouldn't be opposed to MDC biologists studying the environmental impacts of minnow or cricket introductions- after all, that's their job. But again, it's neither here nor there- the proposed rule only affects crayfish.

We don't know whether there's anything in the works for other bait, and it's immaterial regardless- it's a slippery slope. There's no logical reason to think MDC is going to ban minnows or cricket sales just because they've banned crayfish sales.

Posted

A few differences between minnows and crayfish...there really aren't many commercially raised species

A few years ago I asked a few different bait dealers where the got there minnows. I asked because the looked like nothing I had ever seen before. They came from south OK.

Chief Grey Bear

Living is dangerous to your health

Owner Ozark Fishing Expeditions

Co-Owner, Chief Executive Product Development Team Jerm Werm

Executive Pro Staff Team Agnew

Executive Pro Staff Paul Dallas Productions

Executive Pro Staff Team Heddon, River Division

Chief Primary Consultant Missouri Smallmouth Alliance

Executive Vice President Ronnie Moore Outdoors

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.