http://www.examiner.com/x-6356-Wichita-Ind...ouri-hydropower
Remember this quote form Ronald Reagan?
"The nine most terrifying words in the English language are: 'I'm from the government and I'm here to help.'"
How about this one from Barack Obama?
"To truly transform our economy, protect our security, and save our planet from the ravages of climate change, we need to ultimately make clean, renewable energy the profitable kind of energy."
So, in this time of us beholden to foreign despots for our energy, a climate that Gore and Obama say is collapsing around us as I type, and the words "clean" and "green" at the top of the nation's lexicon, how is it that trout fishing in Arkansas is now taking precedent over clean, renewable hydro-electric power for residents of Missouri?
That's the question raised by Wally Kennedy's front page story in Sunday's Joplin Globe.
It seems that Empire District Electric Company is going to be forced to decrease output of hydro-electric power at its Lake Taneycomo dam facility to facilitate increased trout fishing downstream on the White River in Arkansas.
Kennedy does an excellent job of bringing out the details of the cluster but in the end it boils down to one word: Politics.
The economic-political interests of Arkansas (increased tourism revenue from year-round trout fishing) against the economic-political interests of southwest Missouri (decreased hydro-electric energy replaced by more expensive coal/natural gas generation).
Jeff Davis, a member of the Missouri Public Service Commission appears to understand the situation:
“Somebody got to them. I’m not sure who,’’ he said. “They issued a final report and then all of a sudden a proposed addendum comes out of nowhere without any consultation with the regulatory agencies from the affected states. The first we knew about it is when it appeared in the Federal Register.
“This is something the SWPA thought up on their own. We had one shot to compensate Empire and ultimately their customers for losing this electric capacity. The first offer was a little low, but acceptable. The addendum cut it in half, which is not acceptable.’’
There's certainly nothing wrong with the state of Arkansas wanting to increase economic activity on the White River.
But with a new President in the White House and he and his surrogates telling us daily that clean, renewable energy is of utmost national priority, a plan putting polluting human activity above non-polluting renewable electricity generation is a mixed-message at best.
Congressman Roy Blunt's office is now involved, The Globe has brought it to the public's attention, only one question yet remains:
Rhetoric or reality, which shall it be Mr. President?