Some very good comments and suggestions have been made. I would like to put my .02 in. I agree that there are a lot of rules on the books. But that's the case in all avenues of law enforcement and life. Are some un-enforceable? Maybe so, but the fact that their there makes you think a litle harder when contemplating breaking them. Like the highway patrolman and your speed! I think a shuffling law would give some reason to think. Especially if an agent is around. Is he hiding in the bushes and watching? Is the trooper just around the bend in the road? Hummmm. Some just don't care and will do it anyway. That's life. But more, I believe, will give some thought about it before doing it.
I also agree with maybe stocking fewer fish and opting for the better/bigger fishery than overpopulating. The concept of catch all the fish you can regardless of size; is that not what the "trout parks are for?" I'd rather have bigger and better fish in Taney. If I want to catch fish, I'll go to one of the parks. If I want to catch "quality" fish, I'll go to Taney.
Maybe I'm all wrong in my thinking, but that's the way I see it.
John