Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Well, if he was growing, then this last flood would have taken care of that! lol

"you can always beat the keeper, but you can never beat the post"

There are only three things in life that are certain : death, taxes, and the wind blowing at Capps Creek!

  • Replies 42
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

True story.

When I was working the sediment project in California, we found a stream (one of the few streams in that part of California) that still had coho in it. Our study site ran inside a large timber company's holdings and had a boundary with a local land owner.

As part of the study I had decided we needed to monitor terrestrial predation on the pools. We had trail cameras set up over the pools all over the watershed to quantify what predators were coming into the pools and how often. There was a large pool at the end of this particular study site that we knew had adult steelhead trapped in it. That particular pool was a bit of an outlier (adult fish don't normally stay in the watershed that late in the year), but we were curious what would happen there. We set up a trail cam on the creek channel (it was dry season and therefore safe) and watched it for a few weeks. You couldn't really see what was happening outside the creek channel in the photos but it was pointed upstream toward the pool that had a massive redwood growing immediately beside it (one of the really big ones with a diameter around 10' or more). Over time, we got some great shots of an otter catching an adult steelhead out of that pool. There were a few hiccups in the overall data set (the monitors seemed to be photographing fish below the surface of the water when they swam by, something we did not expect since it was a thermal sensor and the water surface should have prevented the monitor from detecting a temperature difference even if it existed) but we did find that predator visits were correlated with fish density in the pools...evidence that terrestrial predators could play a role in regulating juvenile salmonid populations (a hypothesis that would require further testing to explore).

Then one day when we were checking that particular camera, we met a timber agent. We mentioned the camera was there and asked him to be careful of it so that we didnt get false recordings (it was a non-digital camera with a limited number of exposures). It was a friendly encounter, but the next week we went back to check the trail monitor and it wasn't there. Came to find out that the land owner on the property adjoining the timber company decided the camera was on his land and he took it. It may be true that the camera was on his land, but if so, only by a few feet at most. There was no marker on the creek and the single marker on the road was a hundred yards away. By the GPS measurement we were on the line.

I contacted the landowner, explained that were were trying to get estimates of predation on adult fish and the overall parameters of the project. He responded with a long lecture about how environmental laws were preventing him from clearing the undergrowth to suppress forest fires like a responsible land owner and how he was going to call the sherrif on us for coming on his land. Since he had stolen state property it didn't seem he would have had a case even if were were a few feet over the line, but we decided not to press the matter since we needed to be able to sample safely in that area in the future (it was extremely remote site in a drug producing area and the overall stability of this guy looked pretty iffy).

So the project kept going, and one day a couple of months later we looked up and there where that huge redwood beside the pool had been standing now sat a pile of garbage and debris...hiding the stump. A redwood that size hardly qualifies as undergrowth. That tree was also well inside the easement for the river and the removal was a direct violation of state law. Large trees like that are a major reason coho are still able to live in places like California. Once they are removed, the stream banks destabilize and erode, water heats up, habitat is lost and salmonid populations suffer. The wood from that tree would have earned him tens of thousands of dollars so he was motivated enough, scared enough, and greedy enough to try to get us out of the way before he took it down.

I rarely, rarely catch flack from landowners. When I do, I remember this guy.

So maybe Chief's guy is just an butt, or maybe he's upset because he's dealing with a lot of tresspassing and he has decided to blame Chief, or maybe...

...he's doing something he knows he shouldn't do and the paranoia has caught up to him.

I doubt anything will crop up, but given his attitude I sure don't mind checking.

I thought there was something funny when I saw the pics and videos. Now I know what it was. There were no big ol' redwood trees. Praters been cutting them down.

There's a fine line between fishing and sitting there looking stupid.

Posted

I thought there was something funny when I saw the pics and videos. Now I know what it was. There were no big ol' redwood trees. Praters been cutting them down.

...made it across 90% of the country looks like. This man must be stopped.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.