Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 49
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

Probably because the greedy DNR and Jim Rogers found out they could. The reasoning that it's in the interest of the park visitors is lame at best.

The park bought Vogels resort back in the 80's to get more access to the river for people. They then built a lot for their new canoe business and forbid the public from using it.

So basically instead of protecting the river and the use of it the DNA jumped on the bandwagon and used the park and the publicist money to further the overuse.

Don't get me started on the MO DNR.

Today's release is tomorrows gift to another fisherman.

Posted

Ha! That first clip is from July '10 and that's MY DOG! and my girlfriends nephew at Riverfront. How cool ! Riverdog made the future news !

Now, back to the point of the post ..... Are they talking about not letting them put in at the MDC 64access, nor take out at Barclay? Or are they just not allowing them to enter the State Park (Spring branch) area?

Technically they never should have been inside the park boundaries in the first place unless NO ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES were onboard any of the canoes or shuttle busses. It's illegal to have a beer, or a flask of whiskey, or so much as a wine cooler at Bennett Spring.

Posted

"It's illegal to have a beer, or a flask of whiskey, or so much as a wine cooler at Bennett Spring. "

Is that still the rule in the park? I know it used to be, but so many people ignored it I think they either rescinded the rule or simply chose to not enforce it. They used to have signs all along the parking areas saying " no alcohol", but those signs have been taken down.

Posted

I'm surprised that they were allowed to pick up and drop off w/o paying for the priveledge.

It's been a bit of a symbiotic relationship for the past, like, 20 years or more... Something to do with not forcing intoxicated customers to drive themselves to and from the put ins.. Why camp at the park of its just a big hassle from every end?

cricket.c21.com

Posted

It is a convience for both...but the outfitters on the Current & Jack's pay concession fees to conduct business in the ONSR. Outfitters on the Niangua should pay to for their use of Bennett.

Posted

It is a convience for both...but the outfitters on the Current & Jack's pay concession fees to conduct business in the ONSR. Outfitters on the Niangua should pay to for their use of Bennett.

Don't leave the NFoW out, we pay to put in on Forest Service property which is at Hammond on our river. They get to go through our entire operation, busses, etc. in addition just because we drop off people on govt. land. Then they can shut the access down without telling us like they did this winter, so while they complain about the drunks on the river, they shut down the access at a time when the only ones floating would be doing it for the love of nature. Don't get me started on the feds. I have no trouble paying to use the access, but the permitting process is a little overbearing.

As for state accesses, I don't use them because they aren't convienient for me, but other outfitters do and I believe it is free of charge. These are not state parks, so I guess the law is different.

"The problem with a politician’s quote on Facebook is you don’t know whether or not they really said it." –Abraham Lincoln

Tales of an Ozark Campground Proprietor

Dead Drift Fly Shop

Posted

"It's illegal to have a beer, or a flask of whiskey, or so much as a wine cooler at Bennett Spring. "

Is that still the rule in the park? I know it used to be, but so many people ignored it I think they either rescinded the rule or simply chose to not enforce it. They used to have signs all along the parking areas saying " no alcohol", but those signs have been taken down.

It's my undetstanding that the rule stands in all Mo. State Parks and has recently been enforced. I know alot of guys will slam a beer with lunch over the tailgate, and will likely continue to, but I bet the penalty would be pretty stiff.

A boater anchored in HaHaTonka cove was arrested for it, tried to fight it and lost..... So I sure wouldn't chance it at Bennett.

I'm actually not too sure that MDC accesses don't have the same ruling.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.