Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Root Admin
Posted

SB 56 is dead and by default HB710. These bills would have made permits free(56) or treated non resident landowners as residents(710).

Lilleys Landing logo 150.jpg

Posted

looking at the amount of money that would have been lost from removing fees i have no idea why the state would even consider it unless they just want MDC gone completely. Taking the permits away would have also cut any federal funding if im not mistaken?

Posted

looking at the amount of money that would have been lost from removing fees i have no idea why the state would even consider it unless they just want MDC gone completely. Taking the permits away would have also cut any federal funding if im not mistaken?

From what I understand federal funds for wildlife and sportfish projects are based on the number of permit sales- MDC would probably still get federal money for threatened and endangered species, but federal funds for fish and wildlife management projects probably would've gone out the window.

Posted

now i dont know the back ground behind these bills or what the motivation was for them but they honestly seemed like absolutely terrible ideas and i cant imagine that many sportsmen in the state would have supported or endorsed this. Does anyone have any information about how or why these even came up?

  • Root Admin
Posted

Jealousy over money and accountability, and I'm sure there's some personal grudges there too.

They are mad about the deer/farm bill that was defeated. The flood of bills started coming after its defeat.

Lilleys Landing logo 150.jpg

  • Root Admin
Posted

That's what I gathered after talking to my state rep yesterday.

He did say something about the land MDC buys - that land is taken off the tax roles I guess and the state loses taxes because of it.

Lilleys Landing logo 150.jpg

Posted

That's what I gathered after talking to my state rep yesterday.

He did say something about the land MDC buys - that land is taken off the tax roles I guess and the state loses taxes because of it.

Pretty sure it's the Counties that lose the tax revenue when land goes into tax exempt hands. MDC would probably be well served to do something about that issue.

Posted

That's what I gathered after talking to my state rep yesterday.

He did say something about the land MDC buys - that land is taken off the tax roles I guess and the state loses taxes because of it.

The MDC makes a yearly payment to each county in lieu of taxes dependent upon the amount of acreage per.

Chief Grey Bear

Living is dangerous to your health

Owner Ozark Fishing Expeditions

Co-Owner, Chief Executive Product Development Team Jerm Werm

Executive Pro Staff Team Agnew

Executive Pro Staff Paul Dallas Productions

Executive Pro Staff Team Heddon, River Division

Chief Primary Consultant Missouri Smallmouth Alliance

Executive Vice President Ronnie Moore Outdoors

Posted

I'm not too surprised. First and foremost, the bills are just dumb and bad for Missouri. Plus there have been a growing number of editorials the last couple weeks that are making these guys sound pretty petty and uninformed. Here's one I saw today.

John

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.