Yeah, no $#!t ! Never thought about that, thanks for raising my blood pressure yet another notch. That is without a doubt a realistic scenario. 75 bucks would be hard for even an otherwise "reasonably ethical" gigger to pass up. I bet they never even considered that when they announced the tagging efforts....prolly shoulda kept that on the downlow.
I hate to say it but I am glad that YOU got to see, and FEEL what a few of the rest of us have seen over and over with the gigging thing. Especially on the lower Niangua....it's bad.
It pisses me off because they'd set up a night-time sting in a heartbeat to catch a guy with a joint or a beer bong, but stalking a suspected gig boat has never EVER happened, to my knowledge.
If they'd just try a little they could bust a certain outfitter on the Niangua for giving safe harbour to illegal gigging and sieze the darn place. It would make for a dandy PUBLIC ACCESS!
To hell with all this "new regulations" BS, the movement should be towards inforcing the laws and regs rhat are already on the books. That would make all the difference in the world, and would make up for the other issues. Let the catch and eat guys keep a limit when (and if) they can catch a limit...but inforce the illegal crap with considerably more enthusiasm than they have in the past.