Just to clarify (and speaking only for myself):I wasn't pointing my comments regarding not caring for posts that don't name a location at any particular person at all. Thinking about it I would be hard pressed to even remember who does that? I certainly did not post in response to Mr. Agnew's last post. At that point I don't think I had even read his most recent post.
And I certainly didn't mean to make anyone out to be a "villain" as someone else stated. As I said this is an open forum and everyone is free to post what they want - just as everyone else is free to comment upon it, and to read or not read it.
I also think my comment regarding these posts being "senseless bragging" was a little strong and I apologize for that. When you have a great day on the water all of us like to talk about it. My opinion is that if someone posts about their day of fishing and omits the location and or what lure or fly they are using - it's probably not really a fishing report but is more of a fishing "story" - although the details are probably very true. Some stories are well worth reading (to me) if they contain humor, useful tactics, pictures, etc. If not I simply choose to stop reading them.
But I won't apologize for my feeling that the best reports will still always be the ones that do name at least a general location. That makes it more real to me and I think to others as well. I still remember one of the first reports I posted about fishing on upper Taney. Phil responded to my report with "Nice and thanks for posting but where were you on Taneycomo and what were you using?".
I can't speak for everyone else on the "other" side of this but I think I unintentionally came on a little too strong and I apologize for that.
Greg