awhuber

Here on the ONSR they are closing roads that have been used since before it was designated a recreation area. What I am saying is they will tell you one thing and do another.

well I never said that. The wild land policy takes wilderness designations away from congress. Here is a good read on the hearing held on this subject. http://www.roadracingworld.com/news/article/?lnk=rss&article=43481

That list is close to why I thought you would think this way...just sub hate with love

I know here on the upper current alot of the most scenic spots are privately owned. Our MDC seems to think they have plenty of cash to buy public lands. Feds owning land does not guarantee access either. The wild lands referenced above will restrict access much like we have seen here with our recreation area (ONSR)

The Feds owning land does not guarantee it will be taken care of, some of the most polluted propery in this country is owned by the Feds. Again this should be handled by the several states.

Some good cuts in there: ü Clean Water Act: The EPA would be prevented from using funds to implement, administer or enforce a change pertaining to definitions of waters under the jurisdiction of the Clean Water Act – a modification that would restore conservation measures for millions of acres of wetlands and miles of waterways. The EPA wants to regulate all water! ü Land and Water Conservation Fund: Funds to the LWCF, which has acquired and conserved some of the nation’s most popular public-lands hunting and angling deslandstinations, would be cut by $393 million. No need to aquire more land they cant take care of.

The one my buddy had was so loud even the drunk floaters hated it.

A friend of mine made one of these using a weedeater motor. He used it a few times on the courtios. He could take it up stream and then float back. One fatal flaw in his design was nowhere to keep the beer! This would not be legal on Jacks Fork or Current rivers.

Here is a pic of a couple of lunkers.

How many forum members does it take to change a light bulb? 1 to change the light bulb and to post that the light bulb has been changed. 14 to share similar experiences of changing light bulbs and how the light bulb could have been changed differently. 7 to caution about the dangers of changing light bulbs. 1 to post in ALL CAPS 2 to explain that this is considered shouting and impolite 6 to argue over whether it's "lightbulb" or "light bulb" ... Another 6 to condemn those 6 as stupid. 2 industry professionals to inform the group that the proper term is "lamp". 15 know-it-alls who claim they were in the industry, and that "light bulb" is perfectly correct. 50 people to argue over the environmental benefit of fluorescent bulbs versus incandescent bulbs 19 to post that this forum is not about light bulbs and to please take this discussion to a light bulb forum. 11 to defend the posting to this forum saying that we all use light bulbs and therefore the posts are relevant to this forum. 36 to debate which method of changing light bulbs is superior, where to buy the best light bulbs, what brand of light bulbs work best for this technique and what brands are faulty. 5 People to post pics of their own light bulbs. 15 People to post "I can't see S$%^!" and their own light bulbs. 7 to post URL's where one can see examples of different light bulbs. 4 to post that the URLs were posted incorrectly and then post the corrected URLs. 13 to link all posts to date, quote them in their entirety including all headers and signatures, and add "Me too". 5 to post to the group that they will no longer post because they cannot handle the light bulb controversy. 4 to say "didn't we go through this already a short time ago?" 13 to say "do a search on light bulbs before posting questions about light bulbs" 1 moderator to lock the light bulb thread. 1 forum lurker to respond to the original post 6 months from now and start it all over again. saw this and thought of you guys...

Ha ha ...not down there. The next guy would have kept it!

There is a giant rookery on the upper Current. Let me know if you want me to show it to you.

Last weekend of Feb. Had a great race this year! This picture is the car I sponsor.

If you click next to your name at the top of the page you can ignore posters...I'm just saying...

http://www.fs.usda.gov/wps/portal/fsinternet/!ut/p/c5/04_SB8K8xLLM9MSSzPy8xBz9CP0os3gDfxMDT8MwRydLA1cj72BTSw8jAwgAykeaxcN4jhYG_h4eYX5hPgYwefy6w0H24dcPNgEHcDTQ9_PIz03VL8iNMMgycVQEAIzTHkw!/dl3/d3/L2dJQSEvUUt3QS9ZQnZ3LzZfME80MEkxVkFCOTBFMktTNUJIMjAwMDAwMDA!/?ss=110905&ttype=recarea&recid=21780&actid=29&navtype=BROWSEBYSUBJECT&position=BROWSEBYSUBJECT&navid=110130000000000&pnavid=110000000000000&cid=FSE_003705&pname=Mark+Twain+National+Forest+-+Lane+Spring+Recreation+Area

lol thats right. i thoughtThats the weekend I thought he was asking about!

Amen.

Hah... workin late so I can go!

It will be busy here 2-25 in Salem for sure! It;s road rally weekend!!! Come on down and check it out. www.100aw.org http://www.rally-america.com/news/879/

I meant the park will be full of people camping...lol

I had a buck on the cam yesterday. Must be glo....nevermind.

Imo the park will be dern near full this weekend and alot of those folks will be looking for something to do.

It will be busy here in Salem for sure! It;s road rally weekend!!! www.100aw.org http://www.rally-america.com/news/879/ Sorry about the hijack...

The trout water of the Current is smaller than the Niangua. I have never seen a drift on the current and only seen 1 of those pontoons. The pontoon was down stream below Akers and the dude didnt look happy.. Like gavin said the drift might work below welsh.Good trout for 2 miles.

We are going Thursday.