Members Steve_IA Posted December 21, 2010 Members Posted December 21, 2010 Regarding Population problems: So what do you guys propose? Zack... It appears you are dismissing this thought without giving it any serious thought of your own. To begin with, we could end the political practice of subsidizing children. No more child tax credits, subsidized day care, ect. VOLUNTARY government subsidized sterilization would be a cost effective alternative to the child support we now give. Less population = lower carbon footprint! I believe a discussion on this topic to be more fruitful than the eight pages of this thread that preceeded it. steve
bigredbirdfan Posted December 21, 2010 Posted December 21, 2010 First of all the proponents of policy regarding climate change have been proven as frauds and furthermore they are also usually the ones (investors) in these green companies that stand the most to gain from radical policy regarding enfringement on rights to "freedom" (my definition is my safe V-8 truck able to take me where I want) and "pursuit of happiness" (usually money enables all of this). As soon as scientists figure out how to control the earth's magma, core, volcanic activity and solar radiation I'll glady give up my "freedom" for the cause...until then no thanks. As mentioned earlier population control is a far greater threat to our existance than global warming. But economies are depenedent upon population growth to fuel much of the economic growth we all seem to be unable to give up. A married couple need only two kids to sustain current populations and even better would be one and decrease the popoluation.
Fly_Guy Posted December 21, 2010 Posted December 21, 2010 @ Steve_IA - It'd never fly in America, but it would at the same time reduce child abuse rates. Living around this area, I am for anything that results in less children/single mom who lives off the government and occational support from methhead father(s). I dare you to try to get your congressman to sponsor that bill though China passed it because the people have no say in China. We could be like China, but do the costs outweigh the benefits? I would submit yes.
eric1978 Posted December 21, 2010 Posted December 21, 2010 As mentioned earlier population control is a far greater threat to our existance than global warming. But economies are depenedent upon population growth to fuel much of the economic growth we all seem to be unable to give up. A married couple need only two kids to sustain current populations and even better would be one and decrease the popoluation. Then I guess you're pro-choice and a supporter of birth control. What a liberal douchebag. Every time I think I'm out, they pull me back in.
eric1978 Posted December 21, 2010 Posted December 21, 2010 Yes you are! You ever notice how normal people get tired of stupid signatures after like 2 or 3 days?
Flysmallie Posted December 21, 2010 Posted December 21, 2010 You ever notice how normal people get tired of stupid signatures after like 2 or 3 days? Yeah, I had to lose it. I wanted to post some stuff and not look like a dumbass..........well not anymore than usual.
FishinCricket Posted December 21, 2010 Posted December 21, 2010 You ever notice how normal people get tired of stupid signatures after like 2 or 3 days? Just what is considered normal these days? cricket.c21.com
eric1978 Posted December 21, 2010 Posted December 21, 2010 Just what is considered normal these days? IQ of 70 or better...but I guess it's a sliding scale around here.
Flysmallie Posted December 21, 2010 Posted December 21, 2010 Just what is considered normal these days? Apparently me!!
Recommended Posts