Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I was always under the impression that the Corp controlled the flood gates. Given the fact they are responsible for the water all the way to the gulf it would make sense. I do know they are very conservative and don't want to lose control. Over the years I've noticed that if there is the slightest threat of flood pool getting anywhere near full they will dump as much as possible.

I suppose, speculating, that the fact the Missouri and Osage aren't flooded and the watershed of Truman, which is huge, had a rain forecast for a week they decided to go all out? They did scale back from the forecast a little. Truman drains water from Springfield to near KC and into Kansas. I guess they were nervous. :P

Today's release is tomorrows gift to another fisherman.

  • Replies 21
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

Footnote from the SMP;

"For large flood events, AmerenUE and the Corps have a Memorandum of Agreement (MOA), developed in

accordance with Article 40 of the existing license (see 15 FERC ΒΆ 62,038 (1981)), that coordinates operations of

the projects in the river basin with stages on the Osage and Missouri rivers. Under the MOA, AmerenUE

adjusts flows from the Osage Project to help alleviate downstream flooding on the Osage and Missouri rivers.

Article 305 of this license requires AmerenUE to continue operating the Osage Project during flood conditions

in accordance with the MOA, as modified herein."

I can't dance like I used to.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.