Well, in the opinion of this eco-nut, Chesterfield may not be the greatest place to have a population of mountain lions, and I won't deny that if one was spotted this side of the Boone Bridge and my yard backed up to a densely wooded area, I'd probably develop the slightest nervous tick letting my daughter play alone back there. But realistically, you'd still have a better chance of being struck by lightning than losing your child to a ferocious feline.
And let's face it, living in rural, urban or suburban areas all have their advantages and disadvantages and inherent dangers. If I feel like a 6-pack, I can hit QT and be back home in the time it takes to listen to an early Beatles' song. But I also have a much better chance of being t-boned by a drunk driver or mugged for my beer money while I'm out. Plus it takes me two hours to get to a decent river and I have to deal with masses of stupid people on a daily basis. They're everywhere!
If you live out in the sticks, co-existing with wildlife is just part of the deal. You have to draw the line somewhere...if mountain lions aren't allowed in the city or the suburbs or sparsely populated rural areas, where are they allowed? Should we put up fences around the National Parks? Should we just eliminate every species of animal that poses any risk to the almighty human?
What good would the country be if it was just like the city?