Jump to content

College Football


Guest

Recommended Posts

A lot of that stuff has no validity. They can't confirm it because a lot of the players are deceased.

"The difference between fly fishers and worm dunkers is the quality of their excuses." -Anonymous

"I am not against golf, since I cannot but suspect it keeps armies of the unworthy from discovering trout." -by Paul O'Neil

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 105
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

A lot of that stuff has no validity. They can't confirm it because a lot of the players are deceased.

Huh? We're talking Miles and Gundy as the coaches.

Today's release is tomorrows gift to another fisherman.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A lot of that stuff has no validity. They can't confirm it because a lot of the players are deceased.

I guess a lot of those players were friends with the Clintons.

Every Saint has a past, every Sinner has a future. On Instagram @hamneedstofish

Link to comment
Share on other sites

IMO, what I've heard from this OSU investigation, you could probably find that kind of stuff at any major college FB program, especially in the past.

I'm sure it happens at all these big institutions.

You can't tell me that Alabama isn't paying all those soon to be nfl players

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You can't tell me that Alabama isn't paying all those soon to be nfl players

Looks like at least one of them may have been (or more precisely, it looks like some may have been payed, though probably not through the school.) Anyone else seen the Yahoo report on that? Looks pretty bad for Alabama and could potentially result in them losing their titles/wins. Seemingly so many blockbuster pieces coming out right now about potential violations at big-time football schools that it's hard to keep track of. This is a really bad time for those schools too right as the schedule is starting to ramp up for most of the schools involved (especially Alabama.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The big burden is school has to have known, This looks like a case where the player was acting outside the knowledge probably will amount to not a hill of beans. But if it does it brings back up the one question the NCAA doesn't like and that is player making money off their selves and several attorneys are just waiting to make it a case. Im betting NCAA backs off this one like they have others similar to it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.