Gene K Posted November 1, 2016 Posted November 1, 2016 On 10/29/2016 at 5:07 AM, jdmidwest said: I would think they have barriers up to keep that from happening. Went by Sunday - no silt barriers. Everything was tapered off towards the river.
snagged in outlet 3 Posted November 1, 2016 Posted November 1, 2016 Not the first time a contractor didn't use proper run off control......unfortunately
jdmidwest Posted November 1, 2016 Posted November 1, 2016 I was up there for last day in the park yesterday. Did not make it to Baptist, but the construction at the lower end of the park around the lagoons has started. KCI construction had silt barriers up around all of their perimeter. Fishing sucked. "Life has become immeasurably better since I have been forced to stop taking it seriously." — Hunter S. Thompson
Members Born to Fish Posted November 2, 2016 Members Posted November 2, 2016 Wish they would use silt fences, but they're only required for construction sites an acre or larger. I do see a "floating turbidity curtain" on the plan sheets for erosion and sediment control.
jdmidwest Posted November 2, 2016 Posted November 2, 2016 That should apply there. And the sensitive nature of the area, Ozark Natural Scenic Riverway, and other factors should mandate it. But, if you look at the pics, they are not disturbing soil, just gravel and concrete. Instream gravel permits are a dime a dozen and do not require any barriers as long as they stay away from water. "Life has become immeasurably better since I have been forced to stop taking it seriously." — Hunter S. Thompson
awhuber Posted November 2, 2016 Author Posted November 2, 2016 They are returning the area to a gravel bar. Why would a silt fence be required? The park service even gave them a permit (waiver).
Gavin Posted November 2, 2016 Posted November 2, 2016 Mostly sand and gravel near the water. Won't get to check it out till later this month but no worries.
awhuber Posted November 2, 2016 Author Posted November 2, 2016 1 minute ago, Gavin said: Mostly sand and gravel near the water. Won't get to check it out till later this month but no worries. Yep The contractors have done a great job so far not muddying up the river. The sub contractors are local and dont want to screw it up.
Members Born to Fish Posted November 2, 2016 Members Posted November 2, 2016 They should have just left things alone to begin with. Maybe just re-establish a riparian corridor. Design for the original work should have considered high flows, but that's engineers for you. awhuber 1
Members Born to Fish Posted November 2, 2016 Members Posted November 2, 2016 Hopefully there's no big rain events in the next 90 days! There's a lot of fine material in that construction debris that could easily wash into the river. There's already too many degraded areas on this stretch of river with too much silt/fine material from human disturbance in the watershed. They could do this work in a month, or less, if they really wanted to.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now