Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Oh yes it does! Rush Limbaugh said so!

Chief Grey Bear

Living is dangerous to your health

Owner Ozark Fishing Expeditions

Co-Owner, Chief Executive Product Development Team Jerm Werm

Executive Pro Staff Team Agnew

Executive Pro Staff Paul Dallas Productions

Executive Pro Staff Team Heddon, River Division

Chief Primary Consultant Missouri Smallmouth Alliance

Executive Vice President Ronnie Moore Outdoors

  • Replies 330
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

Eric, climate change is a real, cyclical event that "conservatives" seem to want to dismiss rather than conserve our resources and do something to slow the rapid (in the grand scheme of things) change that man has imposed upon this planet.

I'm a "conservative" and what you apparently think is gospel isn't. Most conservatives I know are also smart enough to know that the climate cycles. We are also smart enough to know that Gore is getting so rich preaching his man made crisis as he chooses to keep flying his big belching jet all over tha planet. I know that East Anglica admitted they fudged the figures, because some were "lost" and apparently only available for a short time. We are also open minded enough to question why a proffesor in CA would try and discredit a non-profit non-believer if the facts were solid.

Maybe, just maybe, some of us think that if we had the blown 500 million back from the Solyndra fiasco we could apply that to something like insuring that are food supply weathers the change, rather than our night lights. Maybe some of us do accept climate change, but just don't believe man is as important as he wants to believe. The main stream idea that is insisted on is that man is the biggest reason for climate change, I happen to believe he is probably the least important, well except to the entrepreneurs looking for easy money and the East Anglica followers.

No we're aren't stupid, just practical, and we know the earth hasn't always had the climate it has had today or has science been able to peer into periods as short as the one in question.

http://heartland.org...-interim-report

Today's release is tomorrows gift to another fisherman.

Posted

Geez Jerry! Look what YOU started :D

John

Posted

I'm a "conservative" and what you apparently think is gospel isn't. Most conservatives I know are also smart enough to know that the climate cycles. We are also smart enough to know that Gore is getting so rich preaching his man made crisis as he chooses to keep flying his big belching jet all over tha planet. I know that East Anglica admitted they fudged the figures, because some were "lost" and apparently only available for a short time. We are also open minded enough to question why a proffesor in CA would try and discredit a non-profit non-believer if the facts were solid.

Maybe, just maybe, some of us think that if we had the blown 500 million back from the Solyndra fiasco we could apply that to something like insuring that are food supply weathers the change, rather than our night lights. Maybe some of us do accept climate change, but just don't believe man is as important as he wants to believe. The main stream idea that is insisted on is that man is the biggest reason for climate change, I happen to believe he is probably the least important, well except to the entrepreneurs looking for easy money and the East Anglica followers.

No we're aren't stupid, just practical, and we know the earth hasn't always had the climate it has had today or has science been able to peer into periods as short as the one in question.

http://heartland.org...-interim-report

Practicality and politics in general don't work hand in hand. Climactic shift is a definite natural occurrence, and to ignore the fact that WE have had major impact on the issue is foolhardy. No one insinuated that conservatives are stupid, just that the conservatives seem to be anti-green as a rule. Not to mention the fact that prominent conservatives are constantly seen railing against global warming, climate shift or whatever you choose to call it.

Andy

Posted

sorry Ness. I thought I was just posting something neat.

Wait! I'm the forum smart*ss. I was making fun of this dang forum, not calling you out. It is an interesting bit of info.

John

Posted

Wait! I'm the forum smart*ss. I was making fun of this dang forum, not calling you out. It is an interesting bit of info.

Very interesting indeed, and you, sir, are the forum wise*ss.

Andy

Posted

Not to mention the fact that prominent conservatives are constantly seen railing against global warming, climate shift or whatever you choose to call it.

Are we talking about a climate change or man made global warming?? Once again, many as you do automatically believe that if Gore says "Climate Change is man made" and someone like me says I don't believe that then you jump to conclusions and ASSume that I meant I don't belive the climate is changing. I have a flash for you, I probably have had a much better view than ypou have.

Who are these prominent conservatives, and you might want to clarify "prominent". Just to make sure we're on the same page.

Today's release is tomorrows gift to another fisherman.

Posted

I guess I will throw in my 2 cents of the climate change stuff. We, the USA, have at best 125 yrs of climate data. A former co-worker, engineer in hydaulics and hydrology, spent 3 months in China not long ago. China has 500 years of climatic data. Guess what, it was all very cyclic over all that time. Just like the dust bowl years, and Europes record cold winter this last year. I just look at the facts and when I see something that smells fishy it usually is fishy. Like I said just my 2 cents.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.