Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 75
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

Yep, it's a brown. And if MDC were removing pectoral fins to identify year classes, one would expect all the similarly-size browns in all the waters of the state to also be missing their left pectorals, too.

I bet they're not, though, because I bet MDC isn't clipping pectorals. More than likely, the fin erosion is due to hatchery conditions.

Posted

There's a considerable amount of contradiction going on here....

Gavin 05 Jun 2012

The biologists do use fin clips as an indicator of when a fish was stocked. Usually adiopose, and the left or right pectoral fins when they stock and it varies by year class.. or Tail fin clips when doing sampling. ...and they reclip previosly clipped fins when sampling....

Not sure how the Feds do it....my only experience with clipping fins is on the Current, and the fins definetly do grow back...unless you clip really short...the biologists like that...and they said I was good with the scissors ;>)

Phil Lilley 07 Jun 2012

Clipping- they have clipped brown trout fins to identify their age. They don't grow back.

And I said I didn't care to argue the point..... Did anyone really believe that? :)

Posted

This quote snipped from Arkansas F&G PDF document ....

this year's stocking of 8 in. with a left pectoral fin clip.

Missouri isn't any better/smarter/holier than they are.

Posted

I'm wondering why they would clip the one of the pectorals? It's not a useless fin. Why not clip the adipose?

Posted

Ok whatever.

I think I am becoming bitter about Missouri TROUT....by default.

I think you are just bitter about life.

Chief Grey Bear

Living is dangerous to your health

Owner Ozark Fishing Expeditions

Co-Owner, Chief Executive Product Development Team Jerm Werm

Executive Pro Staff Team Agnew

Executive Pro Staff Paul Dallas Productions

Executive Pro Staff Team Heddon, River Division

Chief Primary Consultant Missouri Smallmouth Alliance

Executive Vice President Ronnie Moore Outdoors

Posted

OH boy, here we go again, I think Bill Clemens said it best, but I just can't recall what exactly he said. Had something to do with, well, I don't recall.

Posted

Here is a simple solution. Microchip them and put a fricken tag in their backs, only reason left with technology today for clipping is DNA and in hatchery fish is that really that needed on large scale?

Simple Solution? Micro chipping is expensive. Putting a tag in their back works, but the tags can and are taken out by fisherman making it difficult to tell if the fish was tagged in the first place during mark/recapture studies. Clipping the fin is a quick and easy way to identify them when MDC does shocking surveys. Micro chipping fish requires more equipment and time when they are on the boat as you would have to scan every fish that comes into the boat. It is much easier to have visual cues.

There are two types of people. Those who dream dreams and wish, then there are the do'ers. I am a do'er!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.