Jacob McIntosh Posted September 11, 2017 Posted September 11, 2017 39 minutes ago, Flysmallie said: I would as long as we can take down those cold water causing dams. I am all for restoring the white river no more lakes but what about the one that aren't in lakes like crane creek
Gavin Posted September 12, 2017 Posted September 12, 2017 Sounds like a wire leader is in order. Muskie & Pike require some caution when handling. Sharp gill plates and teeth. Jaw spreader and a big net is helpful.
Johnsfolly Posted September 12, 2017 Posted September 12, 2017 A friend of mine says that you always bleed when catching musky☺. Maybe that's appropriate since you did stick one or more sharp hooks into its mouth! He uses 60 to 80 lb fluorocarbon leaders and I don't hear about him losing fish to cut leaders.
Seth Clarkson Posted September 12, 2017 Posted September 12, 2017 ICI would you be kind enough to share what type your favorite popper is? Sounds like it has treated you well. I have tried a few poppers but haven't had any bites, may be due to the location I'm throwing them, not sure.
Members Kevin Vam Dan Posted September 12, 2017 Members Posted September 12, 2017 On 9/11/2017 at 5:01 AM, Jacob McIntosh said: So you want to get rid of all the trout here as well Good point, Jacob. And trout aren't the only other species to receive special attention. There would be pretty much no walleye fishery in the State of MO if it wasn't for those darned biologists. Jacob McIntosh 1
Jacob McIntosh Posted September 12, 2017 Posted September 12, 2017 I can understand where he's coming from trout trout and most other species that have been introduced to the state do survive here better than Muskie so I can understand where he's coming from but who's to say if he's wrong or right I like fishing for trout and I'd like to try to fish for muskie but who says Fisheries in this area wouldn't be better if we just left things alone there's two sides to every story
Members Kevin Vam Dan Posted September 13, 2017 Members Posted September 13, 2017 21 hours ago, Jacob McIntosh said: I can understand where he's coming from trout trout and most other species that have been introduced to the state do survive here better than Muskie so I can understand where he's coming from but who's to say if he's wrong or right I like fishing for trout and I'd like to try to fish for muskie but who says Fisheries in this area wouldn't be better if we just left things alone there's two sides to every story I get what you're saying, but there have been countless studies done that show muskies have virtually no impact on a fishery. Some might even argue the contrary...that lakes improve by the introduction of muskies. I love fishing all fish species. Some of the best walleye, smallmouth, and panfish lakes I have fished all throughout the country and into Canada all have something in common...muskies are in all of them! Jacob McIntosh 1
Jacob McIntosh Posted September 13, 2017 Posted September 13, 2017 I wasn't doging on them I more or less ment if if they had never introduced any thing would it be different
Members Kevin Vam Dan Posted September 14, 2017 Members Posted September 14, 2017 I totally get where you are coming from, Jacob. I fished Fellows before there were muskies and have fished Fellows since muskies were stocked...I don't notice a difference at all in the lake...just another fish to catch, photo, and release. I have fished Pomme for decades as well, and that remains one of my favorite lakes for all species. I appreciate the variety we are afforded. Jacob McIntosh 1
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now