oneshot Posted February 13, 2017 Posted February 13, 2017 Why does everyone lump Buffalo and Suckers in with Carp. They are Native where Carp aren't plus they taste much better?? oneshot Johnsfolly 1
fishinwrench Posted February 13, 2017 Posted February 13, 2017 I think it's just because most folks (including some MDC agents) can't tell the difference, or don't know that there is a difference.
jdmidwest Posted February 14, 2017 Posted February 14, 2017 I think it is because they are "rough fish", not to be confused with the pretty "game fish" they like to breed and protect. "Life has become immeasurably better since I have been forced to stop taking it seriously." — Hunter S. Thompson
MOPanfisher Posted February 14, 2017 Posted February 14, 2017 Or because there is little to no danger of depopulation due to overfishing.
jdmidwest Posted February 14, 2017 Posted February 14, 2017 I see a lot less suckers now that gigging is a sport. Suckers should be upgraded to game fish for protection. "Life has become immeasurably better since I have been forced to stop taking it seriously." — Hunter S. Thompson
Seth Posted February 14, 2017 Posted February 14, 2017 Suckers are still plentiful on the Gasconade and that river gets absolutely pounded during gigging season. I could only imagine how thick they would be without a gigging season.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now