Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Members
Posted

Phil.  Did they, or will they, reduce the flow to assist in trying to find the 3rd person that drowned from the car swept into Fall Creek?

  • Root Admin
Posted

No they didn't and I'm sure won't for that reason.  Under different conditions, they would shut generation down if there's someone in the water in trouble -- they've done that several times, as long as they're advised of the incident.  But when they're releasing water in this manner, and seeing this is a recovery and not a search and rescue, they have not in the past.  I'm not sure at this point if it wouldn't help much.  The lake level at Cooper Creek down would only drop a couple-three feet at the most if they stopped releasing water.

It was Cooper Creek, not Fall Creek they were lost in.  There's a lot of confusion going around in the media.

I looked this morning from Cooper down to Monkey Island along the cliff bank.  There's a lot of wood/trees in the water that could catch things.  I saw 4 dead spoonbill.

Lilleys Landing logo 150.jpg

Posted
Quote

Isn't well past the time when public officials need to put as much effort into educating and warning drivers to not drive through water to the same level they warn the public of tornadoes? 

Heavy rain, blind curve, and hill on an unfamiliar road. No indication of a low water crossing because there isn't one there. Those poor people had no idea that the road had that much water coming across it.

As for Valley Park, Eureka, and Pacific, a public referendum vote in 1978 to end the Meramec basin project sealed their fate as permanent potential flood victims. The flood levee at Valley Park also increased the magnitude of the flooding for other areas.

 

Real men go propless!

Posted
10 minutes ago, Gatorjet said:

As for Valley Park, Eureka, and Pacific, a public referendum vote in 1978 to end the Meramec basin project sealed their fate as permanent potential flood victims. The flood levee at Valley Park also increased the magnitude of the flooding for other areas

Why wouldn't they move?  And if they don't should tax payers pay for the cost of these floods?

Posted
10 minutes ago, Gatorjet said:

 The flood levee at Valley Park also increased the magnitude of the flooding for other areas.

 

Yep.  Levees don't solve flooding. They just make it someone else's problem.  I'm of the opinion to remove them all and let the flood plain be what it is supposed to be. Start using the funding that was allocated for levees to relocate and/or buy out flood victims. Use flood plains for limited use that can handle occasional flooding. Park land, bike paths, etc. Yes, it would be a difficult and slow process but maybe in a 100 years things would be in a better state.  Eventually flooding would be a natural curiosity, not catastrophe.

Posted
6 minutes ago, snagged in outlet 3 said:

Let em stay as far as I'm concerned.  But don't get on TV crying for help and money when it floods.

True enough. If you live in a know flood area that repeatedly floods then the cost is on you as the risk taker. Oh, and don't even get me going about Chesterfield Valley. That's a future disaster in the making.  

Posted

It's important to remember that the flood plain is the river, water only occupies that portion of the channel occasionally. Do you remember when we used to hear about all the flooding damage in Arnold? After years of self inflicted damage the club house communities were bought out. Shouldn't this be the model for addressing self inflicted flood damage? 

https://www.fema.gov/media-library-data/20130726-1515-20490-2529/mo_buyoutreport.pdf

His father touches the Claw in spite of Kevin's warnings and breaks two legs just as a thunderstorm tears the house apart. Kevin runs away with the Claw. He becomes captain of the Greasy Bastard, a small ship carrying rubber goods between England and Burma. Michael Palin, Terry Jones, 1974

Posted
13 hours ago, cnr said:

True enough. If you live in a know flood area that repeatedly floods then the cost is on you as the risk taker. Oh, and don't even get me going about Chesterfield Valley. That's a future disaster in the making.  

But, when you live, or build a business in an area such as parts of Eureka, Pacific, and Valley Park along, and South of I-44 that has never flooded until the geniuses with the CoE built levees to protect other  areas what are you supposed to do. Especially when you were there long before the levee was built.

Real men go propless!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.