Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

That'll teach ya to rely solely on somebody else.   

They don't put signs on the ramps when they are icey either.   

Sometimes our toaster doesn't pop-up when the toast is done, so I can't even stay home and be safe. 😳 

Sometimes people's brake lights don't work !

 

Gotta PAY ATTENTION !   

Totally ridiculous 😅

Posted

This time of year about 60 years ago Dad and one of my brothers were about to cross one of the local "low water bridges" when they looked upstream to see a six foot wall of water coming at them and Dad just barely  backed the truck up fast enough to avoid being washed away; so you can never trust the water.  No government was involved in that. Water is dangerous stuff. And in another instance like that Grandpa had two cows and calf washed away in a similar high water event in the early '50s. And I've seen cars deposited miles downstream from where they were parked, and in places where you couldn't have driven them. Never trust the water. 

Just thinking about this makes me wonder if the government should require all wading anglers to wear PFDs, that would be the government being responsible, wouldn't it?  Maybe one of those self-inflaters that automatically deploy when wet?

Posted

The tornado sirens go off every time a dark cloud passes overhead, but the ONE TIME an F-3 took my house and shop......No Siren!

 

Imagine that.  🤷‍♂️

Posted

Those tornado sirens get "tested" so often that they become 'background noise' like the train passing or police sirens that no one hears when they are being sounded legitimately. I recall working Rogers Ar many years ago and the guy I was talking asking me "what's that?", when I stopped talking to listen I realized they were testing the horn system for zillionth time and I hadn't even heard it.   The out of town guy did but didn't connect it to any danger.

Posted

No they wouldn't have and IMO  are waste of tax $$$$ in addition to being an aggravating noise.  If the tornado  is real and it's there, then it's too late for the warning and if it's not there the warning is useless. Wind and water are both dangers that we need to look out for on own time and let our neck hair warn us. Governments at any any level have no control over nature's forces, the so called warnings are just a way to create  dependency. 

Posted
2 hours ago, tjm said:

No they wouldn't have and IMO  are waste of tax $$$$ in addition to being an aggravating noise.  If the tornado  is real and it's there, then it's too late for the warning and if it's not there the warning is useless. Wind and water are both dangers that we need to look out for on own time and let our neck hair warn us. Governments at any any level have no control over nature's forces, the so called warnings are just a way to create  dependency. 

It's very much a typical government "hey, we tried! *wink, wink*" deal to prevent lawsuits and other forced aid.  

“To those devoid of imagination a blank place on the map is a useless waste; to others, the most valuable part.”--Aldo Leopold

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.