Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
2 hours ago, eknapp said:

Is this considered a wet fly?

Short answer is yes, it's a wet fly. Based on the swept back, softer hackles it's made with, I'd put it in the 'soft hackle' sub category. 

John

Posted
50 minutes ago, ness said:

I'd put it in the 'soft hackle' sub category. 

And that is why it made the list. I love soft hackles and this reminded me of one. 

 

 

Posted
30 minutes ago, fishinwrench said:

May just be the way I fish them. 

How do you fish them? I've not really noticed that tails caused rejections, although some patterns don't lend them selves to tails. 

Posted
6 hours ago, fishinwrench said:

Suit yourself, but for some odd reason I can't figure out.....a soft hackle fly with a TAIL does not get bit, but the same one without a tail DOES.  

UNLESS all you are targeting is bluegill in Stillwater.    🤷‍♂️

 

May just be the way I fish them. 

Interesting. 

Me, I just never fish them. Nothing against them, I know they'll catch fish. I just never get around to them even though there are a few in the box. 

John

Posted
14 minutes ago, ness said:

Interesting. 

Me, I just never fish them. Nothing against them, I know they'll catch fish. I just never get around to them even though there are a few in the box. 

Same here.  Never once have I fished soft hackles.  That looks like a giant one.  

Posted

I fish them mostly with a traditional down and across swing. But I have caught a bunch of fish dead drifting them. Especially at Roaring River. Those fish seem to love them like that. 
 

Not sure on the tails. Guess I never really paid attention. I seem to catch them on both but I will admit that most of my soft hackles do not have tails. 
 

I don’t consider the Monkey Faced Louise a soft hackle. Yes it’s basically just a large version but I will fish it more like a wooly bugger. 

 

 

Posted

The way that Carey Special was in the books I had it would have appeared to be more of a streamer because the hackle was called out to be pheasant rump and the long soft fibers would blend with the tail. I found an image of that on FAOLcareyspecial.jpg

Story about the fly's invention there too. I've seen it listed as pheasant saddle too, but as I said before variations on this type fly are endless. The availability of feathers leads to substitution. And time or location  can change what is used or preferred.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.