Photography is really all fake anyway, isn't it? Its just a visual reproduction, so where do you draw the line between real and artistic manipulation? Journalistic photography is one thing that should be kept honest, but anything else you have to realize its been tarted up or manipulated in some way.
For that matter, there isn't much music that you buy that isn't processed, overdubbed, layered or whatever (it didn't get recorded in one live take). I don't know many people that are snobby enough to listen to only "live" recordings, eschewing all the rest.
My older sister is the Ron Burgundy of photography and photoshopping . . . thats right, she's sort've a big deal. Not landscape stuff or flowers or sports, but art with a story embedded in the visual and yes it is all heavily photoshopped, but still created by her. She's travelled the world, had gallery openings, hung out with movie stars that are fans of hers, even did a Time Magazine cover-shot. Prints sell for up to $12k and she can't make them fast enough. Most of the kids used in her stuff are Paul Dallas' nieces and nephews. Check it out here: www.julieblackmon.com