For all the years that I worked for the statewide newspaper in Arkansas and covered AGFC meetings, I'd like to have a dollar for every time I heard "We have to do what the general fishing/hunting public wants." The only definition I was ever able to come up with for "general fishing/hunting public" was any user group other than the one I was identifying with at the moment.
Game and Fish directors in most states seem to love to hide behind that line of poop. I'll give Texas credit where credit is due ... they sure seem to have the best interest of their fisheries at heart and they had one heckuva fisheries director in old Durocher for a lot of years. He nor none of his people were afraid to make decisions that might not please everyone.
As we all know, when multiple user groups are involved, you're never gonna please everyone. But it seems to me that bass --- and certainly the state's bellcowt bass fishery, Table Rock --- has gotten very little attention for a number of years. All things laid on the Table, my No. 1 interest isn't more revenue for the area, it's catching more bass every time I go fishing! But Bo does make a great point about the revenue. If trout produce more revenue than bass statewide, I'd sure like to see some figures to prove it. Yet a TON more taxpayer/license buyer money is spent on trout than bass.
The things we're talking about in this thread --- other than supplemental stocking --- would cost absolutely nothing to implement. Arkansas bass fishermen organized in the Hot Springs area and managed to get the ear of the AGFC and see some changes made in striper stocking, bass stocking, regulations and other things. The group was/is called the Arkansas Black Bass Coalition. There's no reason that something similar couldn't be organized here.