Ham Posted February 26, 2017 Posted February 26, 2017 48 minutes ago, TrophyFishR said: It will be hard for them to compete in the square bill territory. The KVD 1.5 is an industry standard now at $6. Spro better get the cost down because I'm not paying $10 for a square bill. Of course I'm paying $10 for the RK crawler ? I'm really impressed with the RK. I had to have a good day with Wart before I jumped on the RK mule, but I reach for RK first. for all the reasons Charlie listed. I am saturated with square bills. I don't need any more at all. The colors sn the RK are great as is. I can think of 3 or 4 more Colors I would like to see, but so what. Every Saint has a past, every Sinner has a future. On Instagram @hamneedstofish
176champion Posted February 26, 2017 Posted February 26, 2017 This is an old lure I know everything about nothing and know nothing about everything! Bruce Philips
fishinwrench Posted February 26, 2017 Posted February 26, 2017 I was perfectly content with the KVD 1.5 and 2.5 until I tried the Luck-E-Strike RC2 Series 3 and downsized the belly hook. (#4 on the back/#6 on the front). There is some magic going on with that one. Champ188 and dtrs5kprs 2
Champ188 Posted February 27, 2017 Posted February 27, 2017 9 hours ago, *T* said: Think he mentioned RK Crawler 55 - 2 to 5' range. I'm intersted. The present model is the Rk Crawler 55. I would think a new one would have a different model number.
*T* Posted February 27, 2017 Posted February 27, 2017 36 minutes ago, Champ188 said: The present model is the Rk Crawler 55. I would think a new one would have a different model number. Oops! That's what I though Mike called it. May have missed that one. Wife tells me my hearing is poor. I thought it was just "selective" hearing. "Water is the driving force of all Nature." -Leonardo da Vinci
Quillback Posted February 27, 2017 Posted February 27, 2017 6 minutes ago, *T* said: Oops! That's what I though Mike called it. May have missed that one. Wife tells me my hearing is poor. I thought it was just "selective" hearing. You heard right, he said something about it in relation to the 55. I think he said something along the lines of it being a shallow version of the 55. *T* 1
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now