Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
29 minutes ago, JestersHK said:

Anybody see the comments below the article?

Robert Smith says:

I was told by a wildlife biologist a year ago that they had shocked at 59 in. Brown I will not say exactly where. Just believe there are Monster trout in those Waters.

Posted
3 minutes ago, snagged in outlet 3 said:

Anybody see the comments below the article?

Robert Smith says:

 

I was told by a wildlife biologist a year ago that they had shocked at 59 in. Brown I will not say exactly where. Just believe there are Monster trout in those Waters.

Cool that would make it about 66 lbs. I think I will jump up to 4x tippet

Posted

That's what I was thinking, that fish would have to weigh at least 60 lbs.  we're talking musky size, and a huge musky at that.   I want to believe, but I'm calling BS.

Posted

Yea they have not shocked up a 59-inch brown haha. Biggest they've shocked up was 39 lbs a few years ago. They also only shock the trophy area.

“To those devoid of imagination a blank place on the map is a useless waste; to others, the most valuable part.”--Aldo Leopold

Posted
8 minutes ago, Ryan Miloshewski said:

 Biggest they've shocked up was 39 lbs a few years ago. They also only shock the trophy area.

I have witnessed the shocking boat, in the big hole, on several occasions.  With the vibrations from the generator and lights as bright as a moon landing vehicle, I am amazed that any self respecting fish would get caught up in that commotion.

Posted

The current world record lake trout weighed 72lbs and it was 59" long.

Posted
3 minutes ago, laker67 said:

I have witnessed the shocking boat, in the big hole, on several occasions.  With the vibrations from the generator and lights as bright as a moon landing vehicle, I am amazed that any self respecting fish would get caught up in that commotion.

With all the boat traffic Taneycomo gets, I'm sure they don't think anything of it. I think it would interesting to see what they dredge up between Cooper Creek on down to Roark Creek. Lots of 20' deep water and brush for them to hide in and that isn't very far down lake.

Posted
11 minutes ago, Seth said:

With all the boat traffic Taneycomo gets, I'm sure they don't think anything of it. I think it would interesting to see what they dredge up between Cooper Creek on down to Roark Creek. Lots of 20' deep water and brush for them to hide in and that isn't very far down lake.

Oh this is totally different. I've done the same deal shocking up walleye and it is an unreal commotion. I'm with Rick--how do they even get anything? 

“To those devoid of imagination a blank place on the map is a useless waste; to others, the most valuable part.”--Aldo Leopold

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.