Jeff, I think the main beef is that.... For someone who is not "with" the state, he sure has made a killing by using state resources. And it's like they have become so used to accommodating him that they almost depend on his input before every move or decision.
I'm not 100% sure that is an entirely accurate assumption but to my knowledge they have never made a single change that effected his business in anything less than a totally positive way.
Entering into the canoe rental/shuttle business was probably the biggest slap in the face, as they always maintained a zero tolerance alcohol thing in park boundaries, busses, and rentals... EXCEPT for the floaters, only because they knew it would cost them rentals if they only rented to and shuttled "family fun" oriented teetotalers.
Kind of a twisted double standard, no ?
I'd bet ya 100 bucks if Rodgers had a few guide associates that he wanted the park waters opened up to they'd allow it exclusively.
It is viewed (to many at least) as an unfair monopoly thing he has going on with the state park trout program that has expanded from just the trout thing to include ANYTHING that generates money. And if it cuts the throat of other area businesses...too bad so sad.
OK fellas, what have I missed ?