Members GENTLE Posted November 19, 2019 Author Members Posted November 19, 2019 1 hour ago, snagged in outlet 3 said: I know you're frustrated, as I have been when trying to figure what the corp is doing or going to do. But I don't think you really want to see No, not at all, it just seems their testing fate, keeping lakes this high all the time. fishinwrench 1
Members GENTLE Posted November 19, 2019 Author Members Posted November 19, 2019 2 hours ago, Phil Lilley said: Did you know that before one of the floods... may be 2007... both TR and Beaver were very low. TR was about 907 feet. I do wish they'd go ahead and drop these lake levels. TR is sitting at 917.2 feet and it's trickling through the dam right now. It is a little frustrating. Yeah, since then, the corps have gone the extra mile to make sure the lakes dont get that low. I'll agree that the fishing was off back then, while the lakes were low, but alot of our lakes were just getting over LMBV. And I do agree high water does help our fisheries, but now it's just ALL THE TIME. We've always had spring floods and high water, but the difference now is they stay flooded for much longer. One thing about it though, if they keep the lakes high all the time, all that flooded cover will eventually die off and rot away, and 1130 wont be much different than 1120.
Alex Heitman Posted November 19, 2019 Posted November 19, 2019 Anybody remember where you can find the historical numbers on lakes? I remember a year or two back there was a chart that showed the high and low numbers and maybe avg height since table rick was built Phil Lilley 1
Alex Heitman Posted November 20, 2019 Posted November 20, 2019 Here is the link not recent numbers though https://www.swl.usace.army.mil/Portals/50/docs/tablerocklake/Pool History- Table Rock (4).pdf terryj1024 1
Root Admin Phil Lilley Posted November 20, 2019 Root Admin Posted November 20, 2019 That's so interesting to see. I've been here since May, 1983 and to look at the highs and lows through to mid 2000 it looks like we didn't have any big rain events OR they (the Corps) kept the lakes alot lower than they do now. I'd love to have the time to really research this. snagged in outlet 3 1
Quillback Posted November 20, 2019 Posted November 20, 2019 Predictions are for 1.5" over the next couple of days. Remember the good old days when they would predict rain and it wouldn't happen? Seems like lately, if they predict it, it falls, and usually more than the prediction. snagged in outlet 3 1
snagged in outlet 3 Posted November 21, 2019 Posted November 21, 2019 22 minutes ago, Quillback said: Predictions are for 1.5" over the next couple of days. Remember the good old days when they would predict rain and it wouldn't happen? Seems like lately, if they predict it, it falls, and usually more than the prediction. Last year they brined the roads 4 times and we didn’t get any snow. Two weeks ago they were predicting snow ice and frigid temperatures. No brine this time. It took me 2 Hours to get home on my normal 18 minute drive. Road was an ice rink. Would’ve taken 3 hours but I drove in the grass median. Phil Lilley 1
fishinwrench Posted November 21, 2019 Posted November 21, 2019 On 11/19/2019 at 2:27 PM, GENTLE said: No, not at all, it just seems their testing fate, keeping lakes this high all the time. Yep !
jdmidwest Posted November 21, 2019 Posted November 21, 2019 They were brining the road and mowing the median at the same time 2 weeks ago. Funny sight to see. And, it only rained. It snowed later on that week after the rain washed it off. They don't mow the grass all summer and the roads look like crap. Then they mow the frost killed stuff and it looks like crap. Some county roads, they have given up mowing at all, good places for deer to hide and attack oncoming cars. NFS has ceased mowing all of their roads in the SE MO areas, slowing being engulfed by overgrowth. "Life has become immeasurably better since I have been forced to stop taking it seriously." — Hunter S. Thompson
Devan S. Posted November 21, 2019 Posted November 21, 2019 1 hour ago, Phil Lilley said: That's so interesting to see. I've been here since May, 1983 and to look at the highs and lows through to mid 2000 it looks like we didn't have any big rain events OR they (the Corps) kept the lakes alot lower than they do now. I'd love to have the time to really research this. http://www.swl-wc.usace.army.mil/pages/mcharts.htm That page lets you select lake, month, and year(It seems to not be working for me right now but has in the past). Gives a lot of information, inflow, outflow, rainfall (@ dam and overall basin), volumes basically overall and on a daily basis. Pretty cool tool to check historical information out.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now