Jump to content

New Alternative Record Shortnose Gar


Johnsfolly

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, FishnDave said:

Missouri is walking back the ID of this fish.  Now saying it is NOT a pure-strain shortnose:

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/missouri-department-of-conservation-strips-fish-of-world-record-status/ar-AA10Xc4u?ocid=hplocalnews

 

Sounds like they needed to QC their data before issuing these statements 🤔

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, Johnsfolly said:

Sounds like they needed to QC their data before issuing these statements 🤔

They probably took note of your skepticism in your original post above....and decided they better take a 2nd look! :) 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, FishnDave said:

Missouri is walking back the ID of this fish.  Now saying it is NOT a pure-strain shortnose:

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/missouri-department-of-conservation-strips-fish-of-world-record-status/ar-AA10Xc4u?ocid=hplocalnews

 

Sonsabitches !   Why don't they come and genetically test these "White Bass"?

Then we can have ourselves a field day!  😡  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Actually this is the first case I've ever heard of DNA  involved. But then I don't pay much attention to records.

And if the fish hybridize naturally, are they really hybrids or just the same species with odd colors? like the gray squirrels that are all black or all white

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.