jdmidwest Posted September 6, 2012 Posted September 6, 2012 A landmark case, someone convicted of murder based on second hand opinions of non witnesses. Illinois even passed a law to get the case to go to trial. What is happening to the world today? Yes, it does look suspicious. 4 wives dead or disappeared. But, without actual evidence, allowing someone to testify against you based on their opinion of you is really not Constitutional in my opinion. http://news.yahoo.com/jury-convicts-drew-peterson-3rd-wifes-death-194658507.html "Life has become immeasurably better since I have been forced to stop taking it seriously." — Hunter S. Thompson
Jerry Rapp Posted September 7, 2012 Posted September 7, 2012 quack, quack, walking like a duck...............
fishinwrench Posted September 7, 2012 Posted September 7, 2012 How did they classify the crime as "1st degree" with no evidence?
jdmidwest Posted September 7, 2012 Author Posted September 7, 2012 The evidence was he hit her and killed her. The wounds on her body could have been caused by a slip in the tub, or they could have been from him whacking her one. Remember, just is just the third wife, they exhumed the body and re evaluated. There is no body on the 4th wife. Nothing surprises me coming out of that state. If I was on trial, I would want to be judged on real evidence, not "Hearsay". Hearsay can go down so many different roads. "Life has become immeasurably better since I have been forced to stop taking it seriously." — Hunter S. Thompson
Jack Jones Posted September 7, 2012 Posted September 7, 2012 People are convicted of murder all the time on circumstantial evidence and without any physical evidence. However, the hearsay rule they created is a little sketchy. No doubt, it can result in more convictions, but doesn't make it right. But since when has evidence ever really mattered, LOL? "Thanks to Mother Mercy, Thanks to Brother Wine, Another night is over and we're walking down the line" - David Mallett
Ham Posted September 7, 2012 Posted September 7, 2012 I was very surprised he got convicted of anything. He is most likely involved in harm coming to one or more of his wives, but they had nothing. There will be appeals. Casey Anthony walked and this guy got convicted. Weird. Every Saint has a past, every Sinner has a future. On Instagram @hamneedstofish
Jack Jones Posted September 7, 2012 Posted September 7, 2012 Yeah, but Ham,.....Casey Anthony was kinda cute....in a psycho crazy wild chick kinda way. Drew just came off as arrogant and sleazy. "Personality goes a long way" - Jules Winnfield "Thanks to Mother Mercy, Thanks to Brother Wine, Another night is over and we're walking down the line" - David Mallett
ness Posted September 7, 2012 Posted September 7, 2012 I'll sure be interesting to see how it plays out. In the meantime, my tummy tells me Drew's in the right place. John
Quillback Posted September 7, 2012 Posted September 7, 2012 Yeah our trail by jury system can make mistakes, OJ comes to mind. But I'm with Ness, 4 dead wives? The guy is a cold blooded pyschopathic killer (so says my gut). But to feel 100% about that, I'd have to have been on the jury.
Gavin Posted September 7, 2012 Posted September 7, 2012 It's not a good precident....but its kinda hard to care about a man who's had that kind of track record. Hope he has fun in prison.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now