Chief Grey Bear Posted March 12, 2013 Posted March 12, 2013 Its the spotted bass. Chief Grey Bear Living is dangerous to your health Owner Ozark Fishing Expeditions Co-Owner, Chief Executive Product Development Team Jerm Werm Executive Pro Staff Team Agnew Executive Pro Staff Paul Dallas Productions Executive Pro Staff Team Heddon, River Division Chief Primary Consultant Missouri Smallmouth Alliance Executive Vice President Ronnie Moore Outdoors
Justin Spencer Posted March 12, 2013 Posted March 12, 2013 Good info Tucker, if I was in that area I would push for some rainbow stockings, historically their numbers are anemic, and with the limited number of browns being produced, maybe they would oblige if they felt people wanted better trout fishing opportunities outside the park. "The problem with a politician’s quote on Facebook is you don’t know whether or not they really said it." –Abraham Lincoln Tales of an Ozark Campground Proprietor Dead Drift Fly Shop
Al Agnew Posted March 12, 2013 Posted March 12, 2013 One thing I'm curious about in those statistics is how much of the entire stretch of river is sampled to get those figures. If you sampled at various points throughout the whole red ribbon section, I believe you'd find more fish than that in the first three miles and much fewer than that further downstream.
Gavin Posted March 12, 2013 Posted March 12, 2013 Al, I think the sample runs are standardized...at least they are on the Current...same two stretches every year...unless high or low water bollocked it up. A rookie on the net might hurt...but not that much.
ColdWaterFshr Posted March 12, 2013 Posted March 12, 2013 Thats a good question, Al. Also, why stock in the spring months? As Ted mentioned, why not in mid-fall as water temps drop? I'm no biologist, but that sure seems like a better time to stock than in the spring (peak flood season). Could it be a conscious decision not to coincide with gigging season? Of course it can flood anytime on the Meramec, but it just seems like the fall would give those 10 inchers the best chance (assuming they aren't gigged). And only 5800 fish? Compared to the 2 million or so that Taney gets through repeated stockings thoughout the year . . . just seems criminally low. Thanks for posting those #'s, Matt. I imagine it was even better back in the 80s. Would be interesting to see that data. I can understand an off year or two on the Meramec . . . but for trout fishing, this river has consistently sucked for almost a decade now.
Greasy B Posted March 12, 2013 Posted March 12, 2013 Is there room for experiments or does the "Red Ribbon” designation lock up trout management into a pre-described set of rules on trout stocking frequency, sizes and species? To most of us the thought of releasing a truck load Rainbows that would otherwise be bound for P&T and consequently the frying pan would be a great way to augment the fishery. To a fisheries manager working in a bureaucracy the very notion of violating protocol may be abhorrent. With a stream adored by so many and with so much unmet potential could fisheries managers get just a little flexibility from the bureaucracy? Did I just answer my own question by using the words flexibility and bureaucracy in the same sentence? His father touches the Claw in spite of Kevin's warnings and breaks two legs just as a thunderstorm tears the house apart. Kevin runs away with the Claw. He becomes captain of the Greasy Bastard, a small ship carrying rubber goods between England and Burma. Michael Palin, Terry Jones, 1974
jdmidwest Posted March 12, 2013 Posted March 12, 2013 Trout stocking takes place in the spring to allow them optimum temperature and abundant food source. Put them in the fall and the temps get cold and food source drops off. Plus, that is about how long it takes for them to go from an egg to the stocking size. Trout have an optimum temperature to feed and thrive. Too high in the 70's and they stop eating, too low, metabolism slows down to conserve energy. 55 to 58 is optimum if I remember, similar to our spring water. Unless it has increased, Current River only gets 8000 browns, average 1000 per mile of river stocked, which is the park to Cedar Grove. What is the length of the area from the spring branch to Scotts Ford? "Life has become immeasurably better since I have been forced to stop taking it seriously." — Hunter S. Thompson
fishinwrench Posted March 12, 2013 Posted March 12, 2013 As long as trout management has been going on in Mo. you'd think they'd have it pretty much figured out by now. Pisses me off when they act like it's a new thing, and still in the experimental stages. Things sure seemed to be alot more consistent back when everyone wasn't so blasted smart. LOL Whatever !
patfish Posted March 12, 2013 Posted March 12, 2013 but for trout fishing, this river has consistently sucked for almost a decade now. Indeed.
mic Posted March 12, 2013 Posted March 12, 2013 As long as trout management has been going on in Mo. you'd think they'd have it pretty much figured out by now. Pisses me off when they act like it's a new thing, and still in the experimental stages. Things sure seemed to be alot more consistent back when everyone wasn't so blasted smart. LOL Whatever ! FW, I don't think I agree with this statement. Like all technology and science, what is "figured out" in one era changes as T&S improves. You add in the changing nature of a river and social priorites, and it seems to me there is no way for things to stay static in a hatchery environment.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now