Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Will you deliver?

Sure! Will you be close?

John

Posted

Sold my vagabond solo several years ago to a guy on this forum. I don't miss it. My late friend Bicycle Bill Brock gave me a 30 year old Mad River Slipper (fiberglass) soon before he passed, and it paddles great. Better bow so less water in the boat when you run a nasty drop. Think I would go with the Wenonah Wilderness if looking for solo Ness. Better fit for you I think. Have not looked at new Tandem canoes but I'm pretty happy with my 15yr old Wenonah Spirit 17. Bought her new and I've beat the crap out of that boat. Still gets it done. Tad faster than a Disco 169 and it handles much better. Handles from the stern best even when solo. Bow is high so wind is a pain when solo if not loaded right, but might pick up a replacement soon. Think I paid about 8-900 for that boat but new is looking like $1800 plus tax.

I already bought a Vagabond, but that Wilderness sure looks like a good boat too.

Probably 75% of my fishing is on day trips to local small lakes, ponds and pits so I don't need too much capacity or seaworthiness these days.

John

Posted

so whats the best tandem canoe that can be solo?

I need something versatile & agree the buffalo was sorta heavy & slow

I settled on a Mad River Legend 15 and really like it. But they stopped making it.

Posted

IMO anything shorter than 16' is a solo.

You wouldn't want to load a bunch of camping gear in the Legend 15 and paddle tandem. With just two people a cooler and some fishing tackle it's fine. It shines solo though, either loaded for an overnighter or with just a cooler and tackle for the day.

Posted

And by loaded for an overnighter, I do mean loaded.....

That's nothing. You should see the amount of crap I pile into my 169. Yeah it doesn't handle well and it's slow. But it's also stable and can carry an enormous amount of gear.

 

 

Posted

That's nothing. You should see the amount of crap I pile into my 169. Yeah it doesn't handle well and it's slow. But it's also stable and can carry an enormous amount of gear.

I never understood why people wanted a fast canoe?

Or how you you even really know which ones are faster than the other?

But I thought the whole reason for being out of water and fishing was to kind of slow down and ease back a little.

I do see advantages to both a solo and one that is a 169.

So I'm kind of on top of the fence about both of them.

I like both of them.

Chief Grey Bear

Living is dangerous to your health

Owner Ozark Fishing Expeditions

Co-Owner, Chief Executive Product Development Team Jerm Werm

Executive Pro Staff Team Agnew

Executive Pro Staff Paul Dallas Productions

Executive Pro Staff Team Heddon, River Division

Chief Primary Consultant Missouri Smallmouth Alliance

Executive Vice President Ronnie Moore Outdoors

Posted

I never understood why people wanted a fast canoe?

Or how you you even really know which ones are faster than the other?

But I thought the whole reason for being out of water and fishing was to kind of slow down and ease back a little.

I do see advantages to both a solo and one that is a 169.

So I'm kind of on top of the fence about both of them.

I like both of them.

Yeah, what's fast gonna do for you on an Ozark river? Get you to the take out sooner? Yippee! I'm done and can go back to work!

Sure, there is always some water that I'd like to pass through to get to better stuff. But if that was a big problem, I probably picked the wrong stretch to fish, not the wrong canoe.

John

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.