Somebody Stole a Shipment of Bass Pro Guns.

[fishinwrench]

1 hour ago, jdmidwest said:

Could one guy pack them off?

Sure.  One girl could have too.   All we know is that they got taken, I didn't hear/read anything indicating that they all vanished at once.   Last I heard was that they had no video or evidence pointing to how they disappeared or who did it.

Automatically we assume it was a couple guys, but that's not good investigating if you have no evidence.  

[jdmidwest]

27 minutes ago, fishinwrench said:

Sure.  One girl could have too.   All we know is that they got taken, I didn't hear/read anything indicating that they all vanished at once.   Last I heard was that they had no video or evidence pointing to how they disappeared or who did it.

Automatically we assume it was a couple guys, but that's not good investigating if you have no evidence.  

Therefore, let me rephrase.  Do they have any idea what happened?

[fishinwrench]

Probably a false flag/inside job, so they can enact new regulations on how firearms can be shipped and delivered.   The guns will probably "miraculously" show up at a gun show somewhere.....and then gun shows, and the parcel shipments of firearms, will be outlawed.   Then they'll start chipping away at private sale and transfer, as well as inherited guns. 

They first have to create a good REASON to enforce these rules.....and now they have successfully completed that.

I mean c'mon.  A whole pallet or two of guns and zero security around them?  You really buying that crock of bull butter?  

That 25k is more likely BAIT.  If you have any information then you ain't getting 25 grand.....You're getting a shot in the arm that causes a sudden heart attack.  

[Flysmallie]

Don't worry our government is not moving forward on ANY new gun legislation. Not as long as the NRA is still cutting them paychecks. 

[tjm]

NRA backed the gun control laws we have now didn't they? I read some where (several some wheres) that they did. President of NRA spoke to US Congress on the need for National Firearms Act of 1934,  in the '20s they wrote the draft  of the Uniform Firearms Act (model legislation for states to adopt), I remember the  NRA had endorsed the Gun Control Act of 1968 and just recently saw that they want to ban bump stocks . NRA is no friend to firearms freedom.

6 hours ago, Flysmallie said:

Don't worry our government is not moving forward on ANY new gun legislation. Not as long as the NRA is still cutting them paychecks. 

 

[MOPanfisher]

21 hours ago, fishinwrench said:

that's not good investigating if you have no evidence. 

I do admit that I see a good bit of humor between these two quotes.

20 hours ago, fishinwrench said:

Probably a false flag/inside job, so they can enact new regulations on how firearms can be shipped and delivered.   The guns will probably "miraculously" show up at a gun show somewhere.....and then gun shows, and the parcel shipments of firearms, will be outlawed.   Then they'll start chipping away at private sale and transfer, as well as inherited guns. 

They first have to create a good REASON to enforce these rules.....and now they have successfully completed that.

I mean c'mon.  A whole pallet or two of guns and zero security around them?  You really buying that crock of bull butter?  

That 25k is more likely BAIT.  If you have any information then you ain't getting 25 grand.....You're getting a shot in the arm that causes a sudden heart attack.  

 

[fishinwrench]

38 minutes ago, MOPanfisher said:

I do admit that I see a good bit of humor between these two quotes.

 

I meant the first one.  The second one I was just trying to fire some of y'all up. 

Everytime someone talks about how the gubment wants to take our guns, I wonder where they got the idea that the gubment even cares who has guns or not, or who may have gotten killed by someone using one in the first place. 

I don't see stolen guns being any worse than stolen anti-freeze or gasoline.  A person can get their hands on something easier to kill people with even if guns didn't exist.  

[MOPanfisher]

I seriously doubt the guberment could pull off any of the conspiracy theories they are accused of.  I uderstand your humor, just those two so close together tickled me somewhat.

[fishinwrench]

51 minutes ago, MOPanfisher said:

I seriously doubt the guberment could pull off any of the conspiracy theories they are accused of. 

I seriously doubt that they didn't.  But I don't see any valid or worthwhile reason to care.  

People have pissed their lives away trying to prove government involvement in all kinds of dirty deeds, and for the most part they have proved it, beyond a reasonable doubt. But it all ends there, because who has the authority to do anything about it?  

It's best to just not care.  

[Quillback]

Yep no doubt a government secret operation.  They're going to send two crate of guns and a crate of BassPro t-shirts to North Korea.  In exchange the NK's will give up their nuclear program.  That's my conspiracy theory and no one can disprove it.  And if you did disprove it, I wouldn't believe you.