fishinwrench Posted February 16 Posted February 16 Tungsten powder is heavier than steel bearings, and more readily available to fishermen. Probably wouldn't even show up via x-ray. How can any weight be trusted now ? 🤔 Quillback 1
Flysmallie Posted February 16 Posted February 16 6 minutes ago, fishinwrench said: Probably wouldn't even show up via x-ray. Sure it would. It's a density thing. bfishn 1
snagged in outlet 3 Posted February 16 Posted February 16 I had my doubts when the story started with "A Kansas Angler".....😂
fishinwrench Posted February 16 Posted February 16 37 minutes ago, Flysmallie said: Sure it would. It's a density thing. So every fish weighed, from this point going forward, has to be x-rayed ? Good grief 😔 Sounds like it's time to start scoring by length.
tjm Posted February 16 Posted February 16 Surprising that they certified it prior to investigating it, seems like investigation would be a part of the certification. The cheater should have destroyed the evidence given that much time if he wanted the record so bad. "It fried up real good" and he would still have that record. As to "can any weight be trusted now" question, how do we know that 1964 fish wasn't just as full of lead? Any time there is a contest, there will likely be cheater. bfishn, Daryk Campbell Sr, Mitch f and 1 other 4
fishinwrench Posted February 16 Posted February 16 9 minutes ago, tjm said: . The cheater should have destroyed the evidence given that much time if he wanted the record so bad. "It fried up real good" and he would still have that record. Yeah, there's a bit of that story that isn't being told. Rumor has it that the guy has "lawyered up" and is still quite upset that they took the record down. There's more to that story that isn't being publicized.
snagged in outlet 3 Posted February 16 Posted February 16 22 minutes ago, fishinwrench said: Yeah, there's a bit of that story that isn't being told. Rumor has it that the guy has "lawyered up" and is still quite upset that they took the record down. There's more to that story that isn't being publicized. Seriously, I can’t wait to see what’s next.
Quillback Posted February 16 Author Posted February 16 1 hour ago, fishinwrench said: Tungsten powder is heavier than steel bearings, and more readily available to fishermen. Probably wouldn't even show up via x-ray. How can any weight be trusted now ? 🤔 Don't give anyone ideas. 😄 Tungsten worm weights would be a lot less expensive, but maybe easier to detect.
tjm Posted February 16 Posted February 16 1 hour ago, fishinwrench said: Probably wouldn't even show up via x-ray. It would show up on a metal detector as would lead, but a pound of worms or a dozen ice cubes might not.
fishinwrench Posted February 16 Posted February 16 27 minutes ago, snagged in outlet 3 said: Seriously, I can’t wait to see what’s next. Well, if lawyers get involved they'll stretch it out for 2 years, so don't hold your breath. snagged in outlet 3 1
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now