Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 hour ago, Phil Lilley said:

This info is incorrect or outdated. 

Beaver 92,000

Table Rock 70,000 plus. About to go to 80,000

crest level is correct for TR. beaver should crest anytime if it hasn't already. 

TR's high level is dictated by the level of the electric motors controlling the gates. That's about 937-8 feet. My guess. They can't let it go over that and lose the motors. They'd lose control of the gates and release. 

I can forward the corp email if any questions. Bad info all over the place esp Facebook. 

Thanks for the info Phil. This looks like a very bad deal indeed. Stay safe, we will be praying for everyone in the area.

Posted

Champ you are right about social media, the news and even coffee shop gossip! :huh: but the picture cant be to far from the current day truth...I just checked out Phil's FB page and watched the vid of his one cast.....he has a pretty good sense of humor considering what is going on in the background! Poor guy says he has no underwear! 

C4F

Crazy4fishin
A Cornhusker

Posted

the coe certainly does not have flood control first on its mind any longer.  it is power generation.  if flood control was first, they would automatically draw the lakes down to lower elevations going into winter, just as they used to when they did make flood control first priority.

table rock always used to be near 907 or lower by summers end, and by the start of winter 905 or less.  bull shoals was drawn down  15 ti 20 feet below pool.  that way there was room to put water such as we just received.  until flood control again is the first priority of the coe, we will have flooded lakes every year.

just my opinion and observations since i moved here in 1963.

 

bo

Posted

The first quote you posted champ was funny, the second one was on the money with social media, in a related matter LOZ is discharging 103,000 c.f.s. Amazing amount of water out there.

Posted
39 minutes ago, merc1997 said:

the coe certainly does not have flood control first on its mind any longer.  it is power generation.  if flood control was first, they would automatically draw the lakes down to lower elevations going into winter, just as they used to when they did make flood control first priority.

table rock always used to be near 907 or lower by summers end, and by the start of winter 905 or less.  bull shoals was drawn down  15 ti 20 feet below pool.  that way there was room to put water such as we just received.  until flood control again is the first priority of the coe, we will have flooded lakes every year.

just my opinion and observations since i moved here in 1963.

 

bo

Yep, that extra few feet they have been holding in Bull could prove very problematic. 

 

17 minutes ago, 96 CHAMP said:

The first quote you posted champ was funny, the second one was on the money with social media, in a related matter LOZ is discharging 103,000 c.f.s. Amazing amount of water out there.

This water is likely to be around a while. Lots of precip, not just in the White R. watershed, but also the Osage, MO, Miss R., all the way up the line. Does anyone have any info on Grand's level?

Posted

At 4 p.m. today (Monday), Grand was at 754, or 1 foot short of the top of flood pool, which is 755. It's still rising.

ClassActionTransparent.png

Posted
4 minutes ago, Champ188 said:

At 4 p.m. today (Monday), Grand was at 754, or 1 foot short of the top of flood pool, which is 755. It's still rising.

Thanks. Don't think we have a quick link for Grand anywhere on the forum.

  • Root Admin
Posted
2 hours ago, Smalls21 said:

just heard they are evacuating the Branson BPS

Seriously doubt it. 

Lilleys Landing logo 150.jpg

  • Root Admin
Posted
2 hours ago, crazy4fishin said:

Champ you are right about social media, the news and even coffee shop gossip! :huh: but the picture cant be to far from the current day truth...I just checked out Phil's FB page and watched the vid of his one cast.....he has a pretty good sense of humor considering what is going on in the background! Poor guy says he has no underwear! 

C4F

Did I say that on camera!?!?

Lilleys Landing logo 150.jpg

Posted

Yes...yes you did :) and no socks...but no worries I found some in a drawer (gently used) and we are putting a care package together for you as we speak!

Just kidding....about the gently used part!

Take care - our prayers to you and yours

C4F

Crazy4fishin
A Cornhusker

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.