CoolHandFluke Posted January 13, 2019 Author Posted January 13, 2019 It said in the article " approval from the Army corps of engineers " there was another article that talked specifically about the COE involvement. I just have to find it. Lol snagged in outlet 3 1
Dutch Posted January 13, 2019 Posted January 13, 2019 The COE has to approve most any thing connected with streams and lakes. I wanted to make a ditch to Spring creek so I could get fresh water for the cows. I was told that the COE would have to approve it, give me specs to follow and inspect after finished. I opted for a pond. Bass Yakker and CoolHandFluke 2
MOPanfisher Posted January 13, 2019 Posted January 13, 2019 The COE would have to approve the permits, nothing about managing the construction.
CoolHandFluke Posted January 13, 2019 Author Posted January 13, 2019 https://www.joplinglobe.com/news/local_news/needs-of-many-for-water-conflicts-with-lives-of-those/article_776f5b15-30ed-5ec9-9a89-18f14f73b0e8.html
CoolHandFluke Posted January 13, 2019 Author Posted January 13, 2019 Says the CO E is the permit holder. Not that they would build it. Guess I miss understood.
tjm Posted January 13, 2019 Posted January 13, 2019 1 hour ago, Dutch said: The COE has to approve most any thing connected with streams and lakes. I wanted to make a ditch to Spring creek so I could get fresh water for the cows. I was told that the COE would have to approve it, give me specs to follow and inspect after finished. I opted for a pond. A neighbor was forced by the COE to fence his cows out of an oxbow slough on the basis it might reconnect to the creek in high flood stage. If it's water the Army owns it.
Gavin Posted January 13, 2019 Posted January 13, 2019 Fencing cows away from running water is always a good idea. They are a major source of E. coli contamination, and they are hell on stream banks. MoCarp, snagged in outlet 3, Mhyde and 4 others 7
Jerry Rapp Posted January 13, 2019 Posted January 13, 2019 if you really want to know, google Section 404 and Section 401 permits. EPA regulations, which the Corps is involved with. The permits have to do with discharge into public waterways and and placing material into wetlands, blah, blah, blah.
Flysmallie Posted January 13, 2019 Posted January 13, 2019 6 minutes ago, Gavin said: Fencing cows away from running water is always a good idea. They are a major source of E. coli contamination, and they are hell on stream banks. Agreed. They are allowed to roam free on too many rivers around here. Big nice gravel bar on the lower James that would be great for camping if it wasn’t covered in cow patties. And people at TR are worried about the water coming from Springfield. Johnsfolly, BilletHead and MOstreamer 3
tjm Posted January 13, 2019 Posted January 13, 2019 1 hour ago, Gavin said: Fencing cows away from running water is always a good idea. They are a major source of E. coli contamination, and they are hell on stream banks. That slough is a hundred yards from running water and has only been flooded a couple times in the last fifty years. All hamburger and steak pastures drain into some water way. For the sake of clean water we should extirpate all cattle and other meat animals.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now