Dutch Posted January 14, 2021 Author Posted January 14, 2021 2 hours ago, Johnsfolly said: You have to start asking if using a live scope (use hunting terms) violates the ethics of fair chase. To me it is starting to become like using thermal imaging and night vision goggles to hunt deer. I understand that you still need to put the bait in front of active fish, but you are able to eliminate all of those spots where fish are not very easily. That will greatly increase localized fishing pressure. Just some thoughts. I’d say they’d have a better chance than the fish did when we used to use a gig.
DADAKOTA Posted January 14, 2021 Posted January 14, 2021 Gig isn't very effective where you can't see the fish. Livescope still is.
Johnsfolly Posted January 14, 2021 Posted January 14, 2021 29 minutes ago, Devan S. said: Maybe 20 total in 5 hours fishing. A 50lb 25lber and a bunch between 5 and 15lbs. Have to love needing to hug a big slimy blue cat! Sounds like a great trip.
Mitch f Posted January 14, 2021 Posted January 14, 2021 Nice fish!! And also a beautiful girlfriend/wife holding a huge fish and smiling while wearing a Carhartt cap. She’s a keeper my friend! "Honor is a man's gift to himself" Rob Roy McGregor
Devan S. Posted January 15, 2021 Posted January 15, 2021 2 hours ago, Mitch f said: Nice fish!! And also a beautiful girlfriend/wife holding a huge fish and smiling while wearing a Carhartt cap. She’s a keeper my friend! Thanks, she's for sure a keeper. Out fishes me any time I take her. Good/Bad news is after kid 1 in 2018....I stopped getting my butt kicked so often. Johnsfolly and Mitch f 2
Seth Posted January 15, 2021 Posted January 15, 2021 19 hours ago, Johnsfolly said: You have to start asking if using a live scope (use hunting terms) violates the ethics of fair chase. To me it is starting to become like using thermal imaging and night vision goggles to hunt deer. I understand that you still need to put the bait in front of active fish, but you are able to eliminate all of those spots where fish are not very easily. That will greatly increase localized fishing pressure. Just some thoughts. You're assuming EVERYBODY is going out and dropping $3k on a forward facing sonar setup. I still know a lot of people who don't even have side imaging yet and it's been out for over a decade. Side imaging is a far greater asset than forward facing sonar.
Seth Posted January 15, 2021 Posted January 15, 2021 17 hours ago, Devan S. said: Very similar to how we cat fished with a guide on the Mo river. Would check the ends of wing dikes. He would drop a GPS when he spotted a fish on side scan. Pull up on the dike. Measure GPS and direction and cast. Then use line counter reels to approximate distance. He said if no bite in 15 minutes we'd move because he was 95% sure he was on them. Yep. Just because you can find them doesn't mean they are feeding. You have to know when to leave fish to find actively feeding fish.
snagged in outlet 3 Posted January 15, 2021 Posted January 15, 2021 1 hour ago, Seth said: You're assuming EVERYBODY is going out and dropping $3k on a forward facing sonar setup. I still know a lot of people who don't even have side imaging yet and it's been out for over a decade. Side imaging is a far greater asset than forward facing sonar. Do you ever use anything when river fishing or at Taney?
Flysmallie Posted January 15, 2021 Posted January 15, 2021 18 hours ago, Mitch f said: And also a beautiful girlfriend/wife holding a huge fish and smiling while wearing a Carhartt cap. She’s a keeper my friend! Starting to act like Creepy Joe. BilletHead and Ryan Miloshewski 2
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now