jdmidwest Posted November 6 Posted November 6 I saw pics of Montauk Park. Upper fish runs in C&R area under water and lake levee bank full of muddy water. Lower fish runs looked like they were breached and full of muddy water. Main hatchery bldg basement flooded and water in building. May be complete fish loss. Daryk Campbell Sr 1 "Life has become immeasurably better since I have been forced to stop taking it seriously." — Hunter S. Thompson
Gavin Posted November 6 Posted November 6 A buddy sent some pics of the Upper Current yesterday, and it was at least 150-200 yards outside of its banks around Tan Vat. It should be back down by now, but I'm sure there is a ton of debris. Picks from Pulltite CG looks like it got scoured. Firewood should be easy to find this winter. Phil Lilley, Quillback and Daryk Campbell Sr 2 1
BilletHead Posted November 6 Posted November 6 A friend sent this and said it was Meramec sprigs trout Park. Quillback and Daryk Campbell Sr 2 "We have met the enemy and it is us", Pogo If you compete with your fellow anglers, you become their competitor, If you help them you become their friend" Lefty Kreh " Never display your knowledge, you only share it" Lefty Kreh "Eat more bass and there will be more room for walleye to grow!" BilletHead " One thing in life is for sure. If you are careful you can straddle the barbed wire fence but make one mistake and you will be hurting" BilletHead P.S. "May your fences be short or hope you have long legs" BilletHead
jdmidwest Posted November 7 Posted November 7 Montauk looks pretty bad. Park is closed for a while. https://www.stltoday.com/news/local/state-and-regional/floodwater-overruns-montauk-state-park-trout-hatchery-in-south-central-missouri/article_f65219a8-9c8f-11ef-baa1-57ce2a40660b.html "Life has become immeasurably better since I have been forced to stop taking it seriously." — Hunter S. Thompson
Root Admin Phil Lilley Posted November 7 Author Root Admin Posted November 7 Beaver- 1111.83 - 1116.63. +5 Table Rock - 911.59 - 916.29. +5 Bull Shoals - 650.64 - 659.78. +9 Norfork - 551.43 - 567.48. +16 Greers Ferry - 453.95 - 454.61 +0.6 snagged in outlet 3 and Daryk Campbell Sr 1 1
Dutch Posted November 7 Posted November 7 This might be of interest to some of you. https://www.lakelevels.info/USA/Missouri/
Al Agnew Posted November 8 Posted November 8 The 2017 flood set a whole lot of records. So how does this one compare? Some of the major Ozark rivers: Gasconade at Jerome--27 foot rise, 102,000 cfs. 2017--just under 200,000 cfs, about 33 foot rise. Meramec at Sullivan--28 foot rise, 64,800 cfs*. 2017--over 80,000 cfs, close to 30 foot rise. St. Francis River, Patterson--19 foot rise, about 39,000 cfs. 2017--30 foot rise, about 110,000 cfs. Current River, Van Buren--20 foot rise, 72,000 cfs. 2017--30 foot rise, about 140,000 cfs. Note, upper Current got a lot higher flood crest comparatively than Van Buren did this time, but it blew out the gauge at Akers so we don't know the exact figures. North Fork--26 foot rise, 68,000 cfs. 2017--best estimate is about 38 foot rise and 160,000 cfs, but the gauge was blown out. Buffalo near Harriet--30 foot rise, 67,500 cfs. 2017 was not as big a flood that far south. *The Steelville and Sullivan gauges on the Meramec no longer show the flow in cfs, because whoever was funding them stopped funding them. It takes about 10,000 a year to maintain a gauge. I contacted the U.S. Representative for the area about it. She finally got back to me basically saying it was a local matter and not her purview. Heck, it's the UNITED STATES Geological Survey, but apparently they rely on local funding to maintain gauges. The gauge at Sullivan still records level in feet. So I took the level in feet and found the table that they use to show the level in feet and the corresponding flow in cfs and that's where I got the cfs figure. Daryk Campbell Sr and ness 1 1
snagged in outlet 3 Posted November 8 Posted November 8 10 hours ago, Al Agnew said: e Steelville and Sullivan gauges on the Meramec no longer show the flow in cfs, because whoever was funding them stopped funding them. It takes about 10,000 a year to maintain a gauge. I contacted the U.S. Representative for the area about it. She finally got back to me basically saying it was a local matter and not her purview. Heck, it's the UNITED STATES Geological Survey, but apparently they rely on local funding to maintain gauges. The gauge at Sullivan still records level in feet. So I took the level in feet and found the table that they use to show the level in feet and the corresponding flow in cfs and that's where I got the cfs figure. I contacted Gary Johnson hydrologist/engineer for the USGS about the gauges and he said: Thank you for reaching out. Unfortunately, the US Army Corps of Engineers has historically funded these (and other) gages, but they had a budget cut which necessitates the action. We were hopeful another agency might step forward to pay for them before the Sept 30 cutoff, but no luck so far. The cost is $16,300 per year to operate and maintain each gage. We are actively meeting with several agencies in hopes of reinstatement. Thanks, Gary --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Gary P. Johnson, Hydrologist/Engineer https://www.usgs.gov/staff-profiles/gary-p-johnson USGS, Central Midwest Water Science Center Associate Director for Networks 405 N. Goodwin Ave. Urbana, IL 61801 217-328-9720
snagged in outlet 3 Posted November 8 Posted November 8 Btw. It briefly had the CFS on Wednesday. Then it was removed.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now